Connect with us

Preparedness

Homeowner Jailed After Confronting Alleged Squatter in Her Home

Published

on

A Georgia homeowner found herself in an unexpected legal predicament after confronting an alleged squatter in her property. Loletha Hale, who owns a house in Livingston, Georgia, had been dealing with a squatter situation since August, according to her account to WSB-TV. Despite her attempts to resolve the issue, it was Hale who ended up in jail.

Hale’s troubles began when she discovered Sakemeyia Johnson residing in her home with a former tenant. The tenant had previously been evicted, and Johnson initially received a citation for squatting. However, a court later ruled that “Sakemeyia Johnson is not a squatter,” despite Hale’s insistence that Johnson was never a tenant.

On December 9, Hale entered her house to prepare it for a new renter and encountered Johnson once more. Hale claimed that Johnson had “broken the locks” to gain access. She stated, “She just caught up out of nowhere. She had this guy with her, and I locked the door. I locked the screen door, and he forced himself in telling us to get out.”

Despite Hale’s efforts to have Johnson charged with trespassing, it was Hale who was arrested. Police body cam footage captured an officer explaining to Hale that not everyone is as fortunate as she is, saying, “Everybody isn’t as fortunate as you to have a bed.”

Johnson, on the other hand, maintained, “I was written a citation saying I was a squatter. But a judge signed an order saying that I wasn’t a squatter.” The police arrested Hale on charges of executing an illegal eviction and making terroristic threats, as she was heard saying, “leave before I get my gun.”

Hale expressed her disbelief at the situation, stating, “To see that woman walk into my mom’s house while I was in the police car, something is wrong with this picture. Something is inherently wrong with this picture.” She also questioned, “How can she not be squatting when I’ve never had any type of contract relationship with this person.”

Reflecting on her arrest, Hale described the experience as humiliating, saying, “I spent the night on a mat on a concrete floor in deplorable conditions. While this woman, this squatter slept in my home.” She is uncertain when she will be able to return to her property, as she awaits a hearing for Johnson’s appeal, despite Johnson not meeting the statutory requirements for one.

Hale remains in a state of limbo, unsure of when she will regain access to her home, and continues to seek legal resolution to the situation.


What is your opinion of the homeowner confronting the squatter in her own home?

Watch a local news report about the incident below:

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

15 Comments

15 Comments

  1. William Powell

    January 15, 2025 at 12:09 pm

    The judge needs to be recalled and removed

  2. EDWARD SOMERS

    January 15, 2025 at 12:29 pm

    I have heartburn when the law is interpreted in such a way as to allow a burglar to sue for medical treatment (remember that school roof skylight?) or a person can squat and assume more rights than the legitimate owner. I await the ruling from SCOTUS that a person (temporarily) forfeits their civil rights during the commission of a crime.

    • Don

      January 16, 2025 at 3:06 pm

      Adults have the right to throw the trash out when found and any city or state has the right to do anything to any homeowner that throws them out one way or another. Those doing so need to be the ones arrested and imprisoned for being so stupid.

  3. Rick

    January 15, 2025 at 12:30 pm

    This is becoming a much larger issue and the courts being full of leftists siding with illegals and criminals and attacking legal homeowners must be stopped immediately when the legal owners are recognized without fail!!

  4. Rush

    January 15, 2025 at 2:11 pm

    She had a perfect right to confront and remove the squatter with or without physical force, she has the right to protect herself and home using a weapon if necessary , the police needed to support the home owner 100%. America needs to stop all the BS of the liberal socialist democrats dangerous nonsense they have spread across the country for the past several years. It’s time to speak up loudly, strongly and powerfully to defend the citizens and the integrity of America.

  5. Jtamad

    January 15, 2025 at 2:57 pm

    Criminals has more rights than law abiding citizens. Our country is in path to destructions.

  6. Blue Moon

    January 15, 2025 at 3:41 pm

    The ATL police did NOT do their job. The homeowner Ms Hale, should not have been arrested, and the Officer
    should have arrested the squatter for breaking the door lock and entering inside the home.
    Did the Officer know the squatter or something?
    Since when does a squatter have more rights than a homeowner who pays the taxes?
    Hope this is resolved and the squatter legally gets what’s coming to her.

  7. Jim

    January 15, 2025 at 4:33 pm

    She should have. The right to get the burglar out of her house. What king of bs is this.She should have the right to count to three to get the son out if her don’t leave she shoul have the right to use what ever force is needed to get the burglar out of her house including deadly force.

  8. uncle albert

    January 15, 2025 at 8:25 pm

    The squatter is lucky it isn’t me in this situation…….
    As soon as the cops left, there would be another “unsolvable death of a transient” for the paperwork empire to deal with.
    Remember, a revolver doesn’t leave brass behind for evidence !

  9. Redwolf

    January 15, 2025 at 11:11 pm

    I hope it never happens to me but if I ever catch a squatter in my home I’ll ask him/her to leave as politely as I possibly can. If they don’t leave or if they leave and then come back later I’ll kill them graveyard dead and leave them for the ants and buzzards. No questions asked, no mercy shown and no pity or pardon given.

  10. jefz

    January 16, 2025 at 12:14 pm

    In far left liberal states/communities crime pays.

  11. msgleo

    January 16, 2025 at 1:11 pm

    This is so dumb, the owner of the property should be able to say who lives and who doesn’t live in their own house. These liberals are so illogical when it comes to ownership. If someone squats they should be removed and ordered to pay rent for the time they were illegally in a house they did not own or rent.

  12. M. Snow

    January 16, 2025 at 8:39 pm

    Agreed

  13. Paul

    January 17, 2025 at 4:01 am

    they break into a house to rob it. The owner should of had the right to defend their property.

  14. CPO Bill

    January 17, 2025 at 2:45 pm

    If i get one Mr. Remington 12 ga will escort it out to the street!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Preparedness

Master Wildfire Defense with These Essential Home Protection Tips

Published

on

Understanding the unpredictable nature of wildfires is crucial for homeowners looking to protect their properties. The primary culprits for home ignitions during these events are embers and small flames. Embers, which are burning fragments of wood or vegetation, can be carried by the wind for over a mile, igniting homes and other structures in their path.

To effectively shield your home from the threat of wildfires, it’s essential to focus on two main factors: the quality of the defensible space around your home and the structural ignitability of the building itself. These elements together form what is known as the Home Ignition Zone (HIZ), which encompasses both the structure and the immediate surroundings.

The goal is to minimize or eliminate fuels and ignition sources within this zone. Defensible space is a crucial element in this strategy, involving the modification of the area around a home to reduce fire hazards. By treating or removing natural and manmade fuels, you can slow the spread of a wildfire and reduce the risk of it reaching your home.

Creating an effective defensible space requires dividing your property into management zones, each with specific treatment techniques. This approach should be applied to all structures on your property, including garages and storage buildings. The design of these zones will depend on factors such as the types and sizes of vegetation on your property.

The first zone to address is the area from the home to five feet out. This non-combustible area is the most vulnerable to embers, making it crucial to start here. Begin by cleaning roofs and gutters of debris and repairing any loose shingles or tiles to prevent ember penetration.

“Replace or repair any loose or missing shingles or roof tiles to prevent ember penetration.”

Additionally, install 1/8 inch metal mesh screening on vents to reduce ember intrusion. Remove flammable materials from wall exteriors and underneath decks or porches.

The next zone extends from five to thirty feet from the home. Here, careful landscaping and hardscaping can influence and decrease fire behavior. Keep lawns and native grasses mowed to a height of four inches and remove ladder fuels to prevent surface fires from reaching tree crowns. Trees should be spaced with a minimum of eighteen feet between crowns, increasing with slope.

Finally, the zone from thirty to one hundred feet, extending to two hundred feet, focuses on interrupting the fire’s path and keeping flames smaller and on the ground. Remove vegetation near outbuildings and ensure adequate spacing between tree canopies.

In areas with high fire danger that are difficult to access, consider using goats for vegetation management. Goats are natural browsers and can effectively prune brush and low tree branches to recommended heights. They also target non-native species that increase wildfire frequency due to their flammability.

“If you throw a bunch of matches into a forest, some small percentage of them might actually start a fire,” explains Bethany Bradley, a professor of environmental conservation at UMass Amherst. “But if you throw a bunch of matches into a big hay pile, there’s a good chance that many of those will catch fire.”

For those planning to build or renovate homes, exploring the latest fire-resistant materials for roofing and siding is advisable. A simple metal roof without dormers can shed embers effectively, reducing the risk of ignition. Regularly consult with local fire professionals for evaluations and updates on fire-resistant technologies to enhance your property’s protection against wildfires.


Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

Preparedness

Debunking Earthquake Myths: What You Really Need to Know

Published

on

Throughout history, people have concocted a variety of imaginative explanations for earthquakes, from mythical creatures to divine interventions. While modern geology has debunked these ancient ideas, several misconceptions about earthquakes continue to persist today. These myths can be just as misleading and potentially dangerous when it comes to preparing for these powerful natural events.

One prevalent myth is the notion that earthquakes can cause the ground to open up and swallow people, cars, and buildings whole. However, experts largely dismiss this idea. The United States Geological Survey (USGS) explains that “shallow crevasses can form during earthquake-induced landslides, lateral spreads, or from other types of ground failures, but faults do not open up during an earthquake.” Earthquakes occur when two blocks of the earth’s crust slide past one another, held together by friction. If a fault were to open, the friction would be lost, and no earthquake would occur.

Recent research from Caltech University, published in the journal Nature, suggests that “thrust faults” can create gaps in the earth’s surface up to 160 feet wide before snapping shut. However, these phenomena have been observed only in oceanic settings, and there are no recorded incidents of such crevasses swallowing people or buildings. Therefore, this scenario should not be a primary concern in earthquake preparedness.

Another common misconception is the belief that doorways provide the safest refuge during an earthquake. This advice stems from historical examples of old adobe homes in California, where doorframes remained standing amid the rubble. However, as the University of Washington Department of Emergency Management notes, “In modern houses, the doorways are no stronger than any other part of the house, and the doorway does not protect you from the most likely source of injury – falling or flying objects…you are safer under a table.”

Living in urban or suburban areas often gives a false sense of security regarding disaster preparedness. It’s easy to assume that essential resources will remain accessible, but a major earthquake can disrupt even the most basic services. Severed roads, power, and water lines can isolate communities, making it difficult to obtain necessities. This is why organizations like FEMA now recommend preparing a two-week emergency kit instead of the traditional 72-hour one. For optimal preparedness, it’s wise to have at least three months’ worth of food, water, and gear.

Finally, there’s a misconception about the reliability of insurance in the aftermath of natural disasters. Insurance companies operate as businesses, not charities, and their main priority is their financial stability. Katherine R. H. Wagner from the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research points out that “a single natural disaster could bankrupt insurance companies,” leading some to hesitate in offering natural disaster coverage.

In conclusion, it’s crucial to dispel these myths and rely on accurate information when preparing for earthquakes. Understanding the realities of these natural events can help ensure better safety and preparedness for everyone involved.


Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

Preparedness

Discover the Ultimate Backup Plan for Any Disaster

Published

on

In the unpredictable world of disasters, having a backup plan is crucial. Often overlooked until it’s too late, emergency supplies can be destroyed by the very events they are meant to mitigate. This not only results in replacement costs but also leaves you without essential survival items at the worst possible time.

Enter the bug-out bag—a prepper’s perfect “Plan B.” While it might not be immediately recognized as such, your bug-out bag can serve as a critical backup during a shelter-in-place emergency.

One classic prepper strategy is to distribute emergency supplies throughout different parts of the house. This way, if one section is compromised, not all is lost. However, if you haven’t managed to do this, a bug-out bag stored in an easily accessible spot, like under the stairs or next to the door, ensures you have a fallback option.

In the words of many disaster survivors, “during most major emergency events, there’s a strong chance you’ll be alone the first few days waiting for even the slimmest rescue assistance.” A well-stocked bug-out bag should provide 72 hours of food, which can be just enough to tide you over until help arrives or you can secure a more sustainable food source. While a two-week food supply is ideal, as even FEMA advises, having enough for three days can be crucial during the initial chaos.

Water is another critical component. A 72-hour supply of water can be a lifesaver until you find a more substantial source. “If your bug-out bag has a half-decent water filter, you’ve got the most important tool to stay hydrated for many weeks or months.” Even a basic water source, like a pool, can become viable with a good filter, ensuring you stay hydrated.

Beyond severe disasters, your bug-out bag’s water supply can be invaluable during minor emergencies like power outages, boil advisories, or frozen pipes. Having those 72 hours of water on hand can prevent you from tapping into your long-term reserves prematurely.

Power outages are a common denominator in many disasters, be it earthquakes, hurricanes, wildfires, or blizzards. Your bug-out bag should include power sources like batteries and solar chargers. These can keep essential devices, such as flashlights and chargers for radios or cell phones, operational. “A flashlight keeps you from injuring yourself in the dark, and a device charger keeps your radio and/or cell phone juiced.”

In any disaster scenario, a power outage is almost guaranteed. Having extra light sources in your bug-out bag ensures you are prepared, even if one breaks or you have additional people needing assistance.

Ultimately, while no plan is foolproof, a well-prepared bug-out bag can be your best ally when disaster strikes, ensuring that your “Plan B” is as robust as possible.


Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

Trending

" "