Connect with us

Preparedness

Kamala Supporter Arrested for Assaulting Trump Fans in Edmonds Clash

Published

on

An incident in Edmonds, Washington, has drawn significant attention after an 82-year-old woman was arrested on charges of a hate crime and assault. The altercation involved two women, Gina Powell, 55, and Mary Jennings, 66, who were publicly demonstrating their support for former President Donald Trump. The confrontation occurred just a day before the 2024 presidential election.

Powell, who is Hispanic, recounted the encounter with the elderly woman, who was identified as a supporter of Kamala Harris. The suspect, wearing a “Harris-Waltz 2024” button, reportedly approached the Trump supporters with hostility. Powell shared with KTTH host Jason Rantz, “She looked at my face and said, ‘I can’t believe you’re voting for a racist … how dare you, you should be ashamed of yourself.’”

The incident escalated when the suspect allegedly pushed Powell and punched her in the chin. Powell, who was wearing a T-shirt that read: “Pro-God, Pro-Gun, Pro-Life, Pro-Trump,” described the physical altercation, stating, “And then, not even a second, she just popped me right in my chin.”

Mary Jennings, who attempted to intervene, was also reportedly assaulted. She described being punched in the chin and having her jaw “slammed” shut by the elderly woman. Despite the physical confrontation, neither Powell nor Jennings required medical attention, though Powell admitted she was “still kind of in shock” and unable to return to work.

The Edmonds Police Department released a statement highlighting that the suspect’s actions were motivated by the victims’ race and political beliefs. “During the incident, the suspect indicated the race of the victims, and their political beliefs were the catalyst for her approaching and yelling at them about their views before the assault.”

The suspect, who remains unnamed, was detained and booked into the Snohomish County Jail. Police Chief Michelle Bennett emphasized the importance of protecting peaceful political expression, stating, “The constitution protects peaceful rallies in our community, and community members should never be met with violence while exercising those rights.”

Mayor Mike Rosen also expressed his dismay over the incident, remarking, “I’m disheartened that this violence has occurred in our community. Elections are an important part of society, and freedom of expression is the foundation on which democracy is built.”

Despite the confrontation, Powell remains undeterred in her support for Trump, drawing inspiration from a past campaign rally incident. “He got shot by a bullet, and he said ‘fight, fight, fight,’ I got a little jab in my chin, so I’m not sitting down,” Powell declared.

The Edmonds Police Department chose to delay the public announcement of the arrest until after the election to avoid exacerbating political tensions.


How should incidents of politically motivated assaults impact discussions on personal safety and legal rights?

Watch a local news report about the incident below:

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

6 Comments

6 Comments

  1. Don

    November 14, 2024 at 2:46 pm

    Nothing is going to happen to that old fool. People like her are the problem.

  2. Steve

    November 14, 2024 at 2:54 pm

    Another loony, hateful Democrat.

  3. Paul

    November 14, 2024 at 5:33 pm

    Why is it that the perp has not been named? I don’t care what color or nationality she is, we ALL know she’s a dumbasscrat! Age also doesn’t matter, plaster her face all over the media, and destroy her credibility! Enough of the commies being allowed to do as they please with no consequences! If she’s anything like my mother in law, she voted without knowing ANYTHING about any of the people running, or the measures, and what they are going to do to our future! She voted for kamal hairass just because she’s a woman, or whatever she is. This is why people should be tested before they vote, it keeps the morons out! Also, Voter ID needs to happen NOW!

  4. RobertC

    November 14, 2024 at 8:50 pm

    So the police “chose to delay the public announcement of the arrest until after the election to avoid exacerbating political tensions”. In other words, they chose to silence any information that would illustrate just how unhinged the leftists are. Would they have extended the same “courtesy” if the assailant had been a Trump supporter and the victims were Harris supporters? This is nothing more than censorship of the news – people have a right to know about events that have taken place in their community in a timely manner, not when the authorities finally decide that the public can “handle” the information. Where’s the public outrage over this? Every American should be troubled by this lack of government transparency, yet the braindead masses will simply nod in agreement with the authorities. America is looking more like a communist country all the time, and I’m not too hopeful that even Donald Trump can turn things around.

  5. Tim

    November 14, 2024 at 9:14 pm

    WOW ! You mean the tolerant, inclusive, equitable are violent? Isn’t THAT how NAZIs act? what is wrong with this picture? IT didn’t happen in the South. WE can shoot those that threaten us down here… problem solved. less repeat offenders, safer streets

  6. Roland

    November 15, 2024 at 5:13 pm

    This just illustrates how mentally deranged the low lives are. And how infected our government is with treasonous mentally ill Dumbo Craps.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Preparedness

German Activist Fined After Surviving Brutal Attack at Rally

Published

on

In a striking turn of events, a German activist known for his vocal criticism of political Islam has been fined by a regional court, following an attack on him earlier this year. Michael Stürzenberger, an activist with the Citizens’ Movement, Pax Europa, was among those injured during a stabbing spree by an Afghan migrant at an anti-jihad rally in Mannheim on May 31. The violent incident left him with severe injuries, including a stab wound to the thigh and a “gaping open wound” on his face.

Despite these traumatic events, Stürzenberger found himself facing legal repercussions for statements made at a rally in 2020. The Hamburg District Court had initially sentenced him to six months in prison for incitement, a decision that he appealed. Although the sentence was later suspended, the court ultimately upheld the conviction, imposing a fine of $3,804.65.

The charges against Stürzenberger stemmed from his comments on German immigration policy and his critique of political Islam. At the rally, he had pointed out that Muslim migrants from certain regions were disproportionately involved in crimes, and emphasized the need to address the influence of political Islam on women’s rights.

Stürzenberger clarified his stance, stating, “I have always spoken about political Islam. Always said: It is not against Muslims!” He further explained, “My criticism is only directed against the dangerous components of the ideology and those radicals who commit acts of violence as a result of it.”

The activist’s conviction is part of a broader trend in Germany, where individuals have faced legal consequences for expressing concerns about the impacts of mass immigration. This has been a contentious issue, especially as reports indicate a rise in violent crimes linked to immigrant populations.

German Interior Minister Nancy Faeser recently acknowledged challenges associated with young men of migrant backgrounds, who are often involved in acts of violence. She emphasized the need for effective education and integration programs to address these issues.

The situation has further highlighted safety concerns in German cities, with certain areas becoming increasingly unsafe for minorities. Berlin’s chief of police, Barbara Slowik, advised caution for individuals in specific neighborhoods, particularly those with significant Arab populations.

These developments underscore the complexities and tensions surrounding immigration and integration in Germany. As the country grapples with these issues, the case of Michael Stürzenberger serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between free expression and the need to address hate speech.


How should countries balance personal safety, free speech, and legal rights in cases involving criticism of religious or political groups?

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

Preparedness

Clerk’s Quick Reaction Sparks Debate on Self-Defense Rights

Published

on

In a recent incident that has sparked considerable debate, a New Orleans convenience store clerk fatally shot a 16-year-old armed robber during an attempted robbery. The event unfolded when two armed individuals entered the store, demanding cash. Surveillance footage captured 16-year-old Cecil Batiz pointing a gun with an extended magazine at the clerk working at the cell phone counter of Sam’s Meat Market.

As the situation escalated, Batiz was seen stuffing cash and other items into his pockets. The other suspect, 18-year-old Teony Juarez, was wearing a black ski mask. As the suspects attempted to leave the store, the clerk retrieved a firearm and discharged it, striking Batiz in the abdomen, causing him to collapse. The surveillance video further showed the clerk stepping out of camera view, only to return moments later and fire additional shots at Batiz as he lay on the store floor. Batiz succumbed to his injuries later at a hospital.

Juarez, in the midst of the chaos, returned fire and sustained an injury to his right forearm while fleeing the scene. An unidentified woman transported Juarez to a hospital, where he was treated and subsequently arrested. Juarez faces multiple charges, including armed robbery, aggravated battery, and illegal use of a weapon, with his bond set at $170,000.

The store clerk has not been charged, and Loyola Law Professor Dane Ciolino expressed skepticism about the likelihood of charges being filed.
“That clerk was in an obviously high-stress situation and saw the perpetrator still moving with a gun, and it’s hard to second-guess his decision to use deadly force yet again.”

Ciolino also clarified that under Louisiana law, Juarez cannot be charged for Batiz’s death, as the fatal act was committed by the victim, not a co-felon.

Orleans Parish District Attorney Jason Williams refrained from delving into case specifics but remarked,
“Once somebody puts a gun in your face, the rules change.”
He further noted,
“It’s painfully obvious to anyone who saw that video what those two people were doing in that store, and that shop owner did not ask for that exchange.”

Williams, who was elected in December 2020 with support from a PAC funded by George Soros, has recently undergone a shift in perspective regarding crime and punishment. This change came after a personal experience where he and his 78-year-old mother were victims of a carjacking. Following the incident, Williams recused himself from the carjacking case and acknowledged a transformation in his views, even reversing some of his previous campaign promises.


Should store clerks have the right to use a firearm in self-defense if threatened with a gun during a robbery?

Watch a local news report about the incident below:

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

Preparedness

Daring Homeowner Defends Home Against Burglar, Ignites Wild Police Chase

Published

on

In a dramatic sequence of events in Sacramento, California, a homeowner took action against a suspected burglar, setting off a chain of incidents that culminated in a high-speed police chase. The Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office reported the initial burglary attempt occurred around 3 p.m. on Chandler Drive in south Sacramento.

Amar Gandhi, a spokesperson for the sheriff’s department, described the suspect as a “lifelong criminal” with a history spanning over two decades. “Theft charges, gun charges, drug charges — you name it, he’s got everything under the sun,” Gandhi remarked, highlighting the suspect’s extensive criminal past.

The alleged thief, identified as 40-year-old Emelio Correa, attempted to force his way into a home. Despite the family’s efforts to deter him by shouting for him to leave, Correa persisted. Authorities revealed that the homeowner, a legal gun owner, fired at least one shot, striking Correa in the hand. Blood evidence was reportedly left at the scene.

The confrontation left a visible mark, with police investigating a front-entrance window that bore a large bullet hole. However, the incident did not end there.

Correa managed to enter a different residence shortly after. The owner of this second home, Cuong Nguyen, explained that the suspect gained access because the front door had been inadvertently left unlocked. Once inside, Correa found keys on a truck’s front seat in the garage.

Nguyen, who was not present during the break-in, recounted how Correa drove the truck through the garage door, leaving half of it “in the middle of the street” upon Nguyen’s return. This theft led to a high-speed pursuit on Highway 99.

The chase concluded when Correa encountered spike strips near Arno Road, causing the truck to roll into a ditch. He was subsequently taken into custody.

Correa suffered minor injuries and is currently held in Sacramento County jail on a $100,000 bond. He faces four felony charges and is scheduled to appear in court on Tuesday.

The incident underscores the importance of home security and the unpredictable nature of criminal activity, as even a brief lapse in vigilance can lead to significant consequences.


Should homeowners have the right to use firearms to defend their property against suspected burglars?

Watch a local news report about the incident below:

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

Trending

" "