Preparedness
Intruder Meets Armed Homeowner: A Sobering Tale of Consequences
In the early morning hours of a rural home in Herrick, Illinois, became the scene of a fatal encounter when an intruder ignored warnings and met a tragic end. Shelby County Sheriff Brian McReynolds confirmed the incident, stating that the intruder, identified as 19-year-old Wade M. Barnes from Cowden, had previous run-ins with law enforcement.
The Shelby County Sheriff’s Office received a distress call at 5:25 a.m. about a home invasion underway. Sheriff McReynolds noted in a press release that Barnes was known to the authorities due to past incidents, including an ongoing criminal case. Just earlier this month, Barnes faced multiple charges, including “aggravated fleeing from a police officer, possessing a firearm without a state Firearm Owner’s Identification Card, and transporting liquor by a driver under 21.”
During the home invasion, Barnes reportedly threatened the occupants. In response, one of the residents retrieved a firearm and issued a clear verbal warning for Barnes to halt.
“Barnes continued into the residence, ignoring the warning,” McReynolds stated.
As a result, shots were fired, striking Barnes. Emergency medical services were dispatched to the scene, and Barnes was transported to Good Shepherd Hospital in Shelbyville, where he succumbed to his injuries and was pronounced dead at 7:16 a.m.
The Shelby County Sheriff’s Office is actively investigating the incident, with assistance from state police, the Shelby County Coroner, and the Shelby County State’s Attorney. This tragic event marks another chapter in Barnes’ troubled history, as he had previously been charged with “aggravated fleeing and speeding 35 miles per hour over the speed limit” earlier this year.
The incident has sparked a wave of reactions on social media, with many commenters expressing support for the homeowner’s actions. One individual remarked, “It’s about time people start defending themselves again!!! Great job!!!”
Another comment highlighted the perceived inevitability of consequences for criminal activities: “If you are going to engage in criminal activity, you accept the consequences. I did not get shot recently; probably because I don’t do crimes. Hmmmmm.”
The sentiment was echoed by another user who quipped, “The criminals’ anthem… another one bites the dust!”
As the investigation unfolds, the community reflects on the balance between self-defense and the tragic outcomes that can arise from such confrontations.
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
Preparedness
German Activist Fined After Surviving Brutal Attack at Rally
In a striking turn of events, a German activist known for his vocal criticism of political Islam has been fined by a regional court, following an attack on him earlier this year. Michael Stürzenberger, an activist with the Citizens’ Movement, Pax Europa, was among those injured during a stabbing spree by an Afghan migrant at an anti-jihad rally in Mannheim on May 31. The violent incident left him with severe injuries, including a stab wound to the thigh and a “gaping open wound” on his face.
Despite these traumatic events, Stürzenberger found himself facing legal repercussions for statements made at a rally in 2020. The Hamburg District Court had initially sentenced him to six months in prison for incitement, a decision that he appealed. Although the sentence was later suspended, the court ultimately upheld the conviction, imposing a fine of $3,804.65.
The charges against Stürzenberger stemmed from his comments on German immigration policy and his critique of political Islam. At the rally, he had pointed out that Muslim migrants from certain regions were disproportionately involved in crimes, and emphasized the need to address the influence of political Islam on women’s rights.
Stürzenberger clarified his stance, stating, “I have always spoken about political Islam. Always said: It is not against Muslims!” He further explained, “My criticism is only directed against the dangerous components of the ideology and those radicals who commit acts of violence as a result of it.”
The activist’s conviction is part of a broader trend in Germany, where individuals have faced legal consequences for expressing concerns about the impacts of mass immigration. This has been a contentious issue, especially as reports indicate a rise in violent crimes linked to immigrant populations.
German Interior Minister Nancy Faeser recently acknowledged challenges associated with young men of migrant backgrounds, who are often involved in acts of violence. She emphasized the need for effective education and integration programs to address these issues.
The situation has further highlighted safety concerns in German cities, with certain areas becoming increasingly unsafe for minorities. Berlin’s chief of police, Barbara Slowik, advised caution for individuals in specific neighborhoods, particularly those with significant Arab populations.
These developments underscore the complexities and tensions surrounding immigration and integration in Germany. As the country grapples with these issues, the case of Michael Stürzenberger serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between free expression and the need to address hate speech.
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
Preparedness
Clerk’s Quick Reaction Sparks Debate on Self-Defense Rights
In a recent incident that has sparked considerable debate, a New Orleans convenience store clerk fatally shot a 16-year-old armed robber during an attempted robbery. The event unfolded when two armed individuals entered the store, demanding cash. Surveillance footage captured 16-year-old Cecil Batiz pointing a gun with an extended magazine at the clerk working at the cell phone counter of Sam’s Meat Market.
As the situation escalated, Batiz was seen stuffing cash and other items into his pockets. The other suspect, 18-year-old Teony Juarez, was wearing a black ski mask. As the suspects attempted to leave the store, the clerk retrieved a firearm and discharged it, striking Batiz in the abdomen, causing him to collapse. The surveillance video further showed the clerk stepping out of camera view, only to return moments later and fire additional shots at Batiz as he lay on the store floor. Batiz succumbed to his injuries later at a hospital.
Juarez, in the midst of the chaos, returned fire and sustained an injury to his right forearm while fleeing the scene. An unidentified woman transported Juarez to a hospital, where he was treated and subsequently arrested. Juarez faces multiple charges, including armed robbery, aggravated battery, and illegal use of a weapon, with his bond set at $170,000.
The store clerk has not been charged, and Loyola Law Professor Dane Ciolino expressed skepticism about the likelihood of charges being filed.
“That clerk was in an obviously high-stress situation and saw the perpetrator still moving with a gun, and it’s hard to second-guess his decision to use deadly force yet again.”
Ciolino also clarified that under Louisiana law, Juarez cannot be charged for Batiz’s death, as the fatal act was committed by the victim, not a co-felon.
Orleans Parish District Attorney Jason Williams refrained from delving into case specifics but remarked,
“Once somebody puts a gun in your face, the rules change.”
He further noted,
“It’s painfully obvious to anyone who saw that video what those two people were doing in that store, and that shop owner did not ask for that exchange.”
Williams, who was elected in December 2020 with support from a PAC funded by George Soros, has recently undergone a shift in perspective regarding crime and punishment. This change came after a personal experience where he and his 78-year-old mother were victims of a carjacking. Following the incident, Williams recused himself from the carjacking case and acknowledged a transformation in his views, even reversing some of his previous campaign promises.
Watch a local news report about the incident below:
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
Preparedness
Daring Homeowner Defends Home Against Burglar, Ignites Wild Police Chase
In a dramatic sequence of events in Sacramento, California, a homeowner took action against a suspected burglar, setting off a chain of incidents that culminated in a high-speed police chase. The Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office reported the initial burglary attempt occurred around 3 p.m. on Chandler Drive in south Sacramento.
Amar Gandhi, a spokesperson for the sheriff’s department, described the suspect as a “lifelong criminal” with a history spanning over two decades. “Theft charges, gun charges, drug charges — you name it, he’s got everything under the sun,” Gandhi remarked, highlighting the suspect’s extensive criminal past.
The alleged thief, identified as 40-year-old Emelio Correa, attempted to force his way into a home. Despite the family’s efforts to deter him by shouting for him to leave, Correa persisted. Authorities revealed that the homeowner, a legal gun owner, fired at least one shot, striking Correa in the hand. Blood evidence was reportedly left at the scene.
The confrontation left a visible mark, with police investigating a front-entrance window that bore a large bullet hole. However, the incident did not end there.
Correa managed to enter a different residence shortly after. The owner of this second home, Cuong Nguyen, explained that the suspect gained access because the front door had been inadvertently left unlocked. Once inside, Correa found keys on a truck’s front seat in the garage.
Nguyen, who was not present during the break-in, recounted how Correa drove the truck through the garage door, leaving half of it “in the middle of the street” upon Nguyen’s return. This theft led to a high-speed pursuit on Highway 99.
The chase concluded when Correa encountered spike strips near Arno Road, causing the truck to roll into a ditch. He was subsequently taken into custody.
Correa suffered minor injuries and is currently held in Sacramento County jail on a $100,000 bond. He faces four felony charges and is scheduled to appear in court on Tuesday.
The incident underscores the importance of home security and the unpredictable nature of criminal activity, as even a brief lapse in vigilance can lead to significant consequences.
Watch a local news report about the incident below:
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
-
Tactical8 months ago
70-Year-Old Fends Off Intruder with Lead-Powered Message
-
Preparedness4 months ago
Ex-Ballerina’s Guilty Verdict Sends Tremors Through Gun-Owner Community
-
Tactical8 months ago
Vape Shop Employee Confronts Armed Crooks, Sends Them Running
-
Preparedness3 months ago
Good Samaritan Saves Trooper in Harrowing Interstate Confrontation
-
Tactical8 months ago
Midnight SUV Theft Interrupted by Armed Homeowner’s Retaliation
-
Survival Stories1 year ago
Emily’s 30-Day Experience of Being Stranded on a Desert Island
-
Preparedness3 months ago
Arizona Engineer’s Headless Body Found in Desert: Friend Charged
-
Preparedness3 months ago
Boy Saves Dad from Bear Attack with One Perfect Shot
Richard
November 6, 2024 at 11:43 am
Anyone breaking into homes are responsible for whatever response are taken by people! Safety of those residents takes precedence over criminals!
Don
November 6, 2024 at 1:43 pm
One less bad guy that won’t be stealing anymore.
Michael Graham
November 6, 2024 at 4:35 pm
As the quote goes “When seconds count the Police are only minutes away”!
Anti firearm advocates always stress “let law enforcement officers protect you”.You don’t need a gun. Well, you don’t get to say “king’s X,I want to call 911”. There are times that if you can you MUST defend yourself. In resent times these same woke liberals have pushed to defund and reduce police effectiveness so it is even more important that you be able to protect yourself and your loved ones.
Paul
November 6, 2024 at 6:09 pm
Women and “children” think they can do as they please without consequences just because they are female or under age. NOT ANY MORE! You get what’s coming to you when you break the law, especially when the courts just turn you lose without the proper consequences! The courts need to start doing what they are supposed to do, or Citizens will! Enough is enough! The home owner did what he had to, and there’s one less punk on the streets abusing oxygen!