Preparedness
Gun-Law Twist: Off-Duty Cop’s Killer May Dodge Prison Sentence

The legal saga surrounding a domestic tragedy that resulted in the death of an off-duty police sergeant in Michigan might conclude without the alleged perpetrator spending any time behind bars. The case hinges on an incident of apparent domestic violence in mid-2019 that culminated in the fatal shooting of Elaine Williams, a mother of two and a 14-year member of the Detroit Police Department (DPD).
Williams’ live-in boyfriend, Eddie Ray-Jr. Johnson, was the one who allegedly pulled the trigger. The couple had spent the evening socializing with neighbors before an argument broke out upon their return home. As the situation escalated, the confrontation turned fatal, leaving Williams dead from multiple gunshot wounds and Johnson injured from one.
The tragic events unfolded just before midnight when the police received reports of a shooting at the couple’s home. Upon arrival, they found Williams already dead and Johnson, also shot, in a critical condition. Both had blood-alcohol levels significantly above Michigan’s legal limit for driving.
After the investigation, the police revealed that eight .40 caliber shell casings found at the scene all originated from Williams’ service weapon, a Smith and Wesson pistol issued by her department. Johnson was arrested immediately and, after surgery for his gunshot wound, claimed that he had shot Williams in self-defense after she shot him.
“In this case, where both parties were shot with the same gun, the order of events is open to multiple interpretations,” said Wayne County prosecutor Kym Worthy. “Considering our burden of proof, we believe this is an appropriate resolution.”
Johnson, now 40, was initially charged with first-degree murder and felony firearm but was offered a plea deal by prosecutors that included no jail time, only probation for three years. If he violates the terms of his probation, he could face up to 15 years in prison. Johnson, who arrived in court in a wheelchair wearing an arm brace, pleaded no contest to manslaughter.
“The heart of the Detroit Police Department still breaks at the tragic death of Sergeant Elaine Williams,” said Detroit Police Chief James White. “This plea deal is not the outcome that the DPD wanted for Sgt. Williams’ loved ones, but we understand the unique circumstances of this case and therefore accept the Prosecutor’s decision.”
However, not everyone is happy with the outcome. Retired Detroit Police Assistant Chief Steve Dolunt expressed his concern about Johnson potentially avoiding jail time.
“I know a lot of cops aren’t going to be happy about this,” Dolunt stated. “I don’t have all the facts, but probation seems awfully lenient. It seems they could’ve tried to charge him with involuntary manslaughter, at least.”
The fate of Johnson now rests in the hands of a judge who will have to approve the plea deal. Johnson’s sentencing hearing is set for June 14 with Wayne County Circuit Judge Charise Anderson. Johnson’s attorney, Raymond Burkett, has not yet commented on the case.
Watch a local news report about the incident below:
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Preparedness
Chickens or Ducks Which Reigns Supreme on Your Homestead

When it comes to choosing the right poultry for your homestead, the decision often boils down to chickens or ducks. Both have their unique advantages and challenges, making the choice a personal one that depends on your specific needs and environment.
For those starting their journey into homesteading, both chickens and ducks offer a steady supply of eggs and meat. However, differences in egg production may influence your decision. Ducks generally outlay chickens, producing between 32 to 52 pounds of eggs annually, compared to chickens’ 22 to 34 pounds. The breed plays a significant role in these numbers, so research is crucial.
Ducks take a little longer to start laying eggs, beginning at 6-7 months, compared to chickens at 4-5 months. Nevertheless, ducks often have a longer productive lifespan. Duck eggs are not only larger, averaging 2.5 ounces compared to chicken eggs at 1.5 ounces, but they also boast higher fat, protein, cholesterol, and omega-3 levels.
Both birds are viable options for meat production. While chicken meat is more familiar to many, duck meat is a nutritious alternative enjoyed globally. The process of raising these birds for meat is similar, though some breeds are more suitable than others.
In terms of housing, chickens are more adaptable to confinement, making them a better choice for limited spaces. They require coops with roosting bars and nesting boxes. Ducks thrive in a free-range setting but still need a “duck house” for safety. Unlike chickens, ducks don’t need nesting boxes, as they create nests from available litter.
“Ducks tend to be messier than chickens,” which means more cleaning in their housing area. Regardless of your choice, sturdy fencing is crucial to protect them from predators. Ducks require less height in fencing since they aren’t strong fliers, but a roof is essential to guard against aerial threats.
Environmental conditions also play a role in your decision. While chickens need specific breeds to tolerate extreme climates, ducks are more adaptable to varying weather conditions. Ducks also manage well in wet environments, unlike chickens, which prefer drier settings.
Water is a significant consideration for ducks, as they need more than chickens. Ideally, a pond or a filled baby pool should be available for ducks to bathe and clear their nasal passages. “At a minimum, ducks need to be able to dunk their whole head into water on a daily basis.”
Dietary needs differ slightly between the two. Chickens require a controlled diet with measured feedings, whereas ducks, especially if free-range, forage for much of their food. They are excellent for natural pest control, consuming slugs, worms, and various insects.
Ducks generally exhibit stronger disease resistance and have fewer health problems, particularly in their youth. They are also quieter than chickens, which can be quite noisy, especially if roosters are present. Ducks only become loud when agitated, and male ducks, or drakes, emit a wheezing sound rather than a quack.
Temperament is another factor to consider. Ducks are typically friendlier and less aggressive than chickens, which are known to peck. Ducks are also easier to manage since they don’t fly or run as quickly.
Availability and cost can be deciding factors too. Chickens are widely accessible and affordable, whereas ducks might require ordering and are usually more expensive upfront. However, duck eggs can fetch a higher price if you plan to sell them.
Ultimately, the choice between chickens and ducks depends on your homestead’s specific needs and conditions. Weighing the pros and cons of each will help you make the best decision for your situation.
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
Preparedness
Master Urban Survival: Two Essential Preparedness Strategies

In the bustling environment of city life, emergencies can strike at any moment, often catching residents off guard. Whether it’s during your daily commute, while you’re at work, or even in the middle of the night, urban dwellers must be ready for anything. This is why it’s crucial to have multiple contingency plans.
“Have a Plan B, C, D and E,” to ensure you’re never left without options. This involves preparing emergency kits and planning several evacuation routes, both by car and on foot. When an emergency unfolds, having various strategies allows you to choose the best course of action under pressure.
Preparation doesn’t stop at planning; it extends to practice. If you anticipate needing to walk long distances, such as 30 miles out of the city with a heavy pack, physical readiness is key. Understanding the terrain firsthand is vital, as maps and apps may fail, particularly if cellular service is disrupted. In a true crisis, self-reliance on your experience and pre-established plans is paramount.
The second principle of urban preparedness involves embracing self-reliance. City life often provides easy access to modern conveniences, but these can vanish quickly in a crisis. “You won’t be able to rely on an Uber during a crisis,” and access to essentials like food, water, and power might be severely restricted.
Growing your own food in the city, contrary to popular belief, is entirely feasible. Vegetables can flourish in potted plants on rooftop gardens, and herbs like basil can thrive in sunny, southern-facing windows. Community gardens also offer urban garden plots for those willing to cultivate their own food supply. “Learning to grow your own food is an extremely valuable skill,” aiding not just in emergencies but also in potential resettlement scenarios.
Foraging is another valuable skill, often underestimated in urban settings. Despite misconceptions, cities are not entirely disconnected from nature. Local foraging groups can guide you on what is safe to pick and eat, allowing you to supplement your food supply without battling supermarket crowds.
Ultimately, the key to urban preparedness lies in continuous learning and self-reliance. In a crisis, relying on external help can be a lengthy wait, as thousands of others might be seeking the same assistance. By mastering these skills, you can navigate emergencies more confidently and independently.
In conclusion, embracing these two principles—having multiple plans and fostering self-reliance—will set you on the path to comprehensive urban preparedness. Avoid feeling overwhelmed by taking it step by step, ensuring that you and your loved ones are ready for whatever challenges city life might throw your way.
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
Preparedness
Nationwide Concealed Carry: A Game Changer for Gun Owners?

House Republicans are once again advocating for a nationwide policy that would allow concealed carry permits to be recognized across state lines. This initiative, known as the Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act, aims to ensure that concealed carry permits are treated similarly to driver’s licenses, which are acknowledged by all states.
“There’s a lot of words there, but it’s a very common sense, simple piece of legislation,” explained Rep. Richard Hudson from North Carolina, the primary sponsor of the bill. Hudson emphasized the fundamental idea behind the proposal: “It says that every state should recognize the concealed carry permissions of the other states.”
The bill has garnered support from numerous Republican lawmakers and even one Democrat in the past. Proponents argue that it provides protection for law-abiding gun owners who might otherwise face legal issues simply for crossing state borders. Hudson articulated this concern by stating, “When law-abiding citizens are traveling, they shouldn’t be turned into criminals because they cross the state line.”
Former President Donald Trump has also expressed his endorsement of the bill. In a campaign video for 2024, Trump declared, “I will sign concealed carry reciprocity. Your Second Amendment does not end at the state line.”
This isn’t the first time such legislation has been introduced. A similar bill passed the House in 2017 but encountered obstacles in the Senate. Hudson remains optimistic about the current efforts, noting, “We got it through the Judiciary Committee, we got it through the House. But the Senate wouldn’t move it.” He further mentioned that Senate Majority Leader John Thune is committed to advancing the issue this time around.
Despite its support, the bill faces considerable opposition from gun safety advocates and certain state officials. Critics argue that a national reciprocity law could undermine individual states’ authority to enforce their own concealed carry standards, potentially diluting stricter gun regulations in states like New York and California.
“These lawmakers are pushing a federal mandate that would override carefully crafted gun safety laws, like New York’s,” said Everytown for Gun Safety in a statement. They expressed concern that such a mandate would force states to allow individuals from across the nation to carry concealed firearms without sufficient oversight.
Opponents also highlight significant variations in state laws regarding concealed carry. While some states have stringent measures preventing individuals with violent criminal records from carrying concealed weapons, others have more relaxed requirements. Critics argue that a nationwide policy could permit more dangerous individuals to legally carry firearms in states with stricter regulations.
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
-
Tactical1 year ago
70-Year-Old Fends Off Intruder with Lead-Powered Message
-
Tactical1 year ago
Vape Shop Employee Confronts Armed Crooks, Sends Them Running
-
Preparedness9 months ago
Ex-Ballerina’s Guilty Verdict Sends Tremors Through Gun-Owner Community
-
Preparedness7 months ago
Good Samaritan Saves Trooper in Harrowing Interstate Confrontation
-
Tactical1 year ago
Midnight SUV Theft Interrupted by Armed Homeowner’s Retaliation
-
Survival Stories2 years ago
Emily’s 30-Day Experience of Being Stranded on a Desert Island
-
Preparedness7 months ago
Arizona Engineer’s Headless Body Found in Desert: Friend Charged
-
Preparedness7 months ago
Boy Saves Dad from Bear Attack with One Perfect Shot
Thomas Robel
May 16, 2024 at 12:44 pm
When are we going to learn, if you keep giving lite or no penalties, crime of all kinds is going to run ramped. We have become a society of pussies, sorry i mean forgivers, no that is not right ether. I just get so mad with all this. We need to bring back stiffer penalties, even the death scents, not for this but for the cold blooded murders happening every day. THE PENALTIES MUST FIT THE CRIME!!! Or crime will keep happening.
Gerald Hallman
May 16, 2024 at 4:05 pm
I am a firm believer in innocence until proven guilty and that guilt should be established in court, not in public opinion. Sometimes the actual truth will not be known and the guilt unproven. However the government should never have the ability to sentence someone based on popular opinion and undue influence of the media. The taking of another’s life should always be examined fully and all evidence provided to either justify or condemn the actions of all those involved.
Rich
May 19, 2024 at 12:28 pm
The level of alcohol the couple drank the evening of the crime played a major part to this volatile situation. What was not established, at least in this article, is which one introduced the off duty officers gun into their argument and who shot who first.
The first probable scenario is that the firearm was the woman’s, department issued handgun, so more than likely she had possession of her gun in her purse. The question is did she introduce her gun because her boyfriend was physically assaulting her and she shot him the one time, before her boyfriend wrestled her gun away from her grasp and fired the 8-shots fired at her.
This article doesn’t state if there was any other witnesses, aside from her boyfriend, who lived to give his side of what happened. The Sergeant, who did not survive does not get to give her side of the story.
Due to this fact, it’s obviously difficult to determine exactly what happened during the night of this senseless incident.
john michael
May 19, 2024 at 4:58 pm
this is baloney. He apparently got the gun away from her and was, therefore no longer in danger of being shot by her. Accordingly, his claim of self-defense is ridiculous and he had no reason to shoot her multiple times. Nothing worse than a lazy prosecutor. Hopefully the judge will deny the deal.