Connect with us

Preparedness

Drive-Thru Dispute Over Corn Leaves KFC Worker Fighting for Life

Published

on

In a shocking incident, a KFC employee was gravely wounded in St. Louis, when a dispute over the unavailability of corn at the restaurant turned deadly. The 25-year-old employee sustained severe injuries.

According to KMOV 4, the trouble began when a man aged between 40-50 years pulled up at the drive-thru. The man became aggressive upon learning that the fast-food establishment had run out of corn.

As tensions heightened, the disgruntled customer brandished a firearm at the drive-thru window, furthering his threats. Thereafter, the 25-year-old employee decided to approach the car outside, where he was tragically shot in the abdomen.

“KFC employee hospitalized after customer opens fire because he was upset that the restaurant had run out of corn, police say.

Renee Brandao, a local resident, expressed her dismay to KMOV 4 News, saying, “They’re just there getting a paycheck. They’re not even running the business. It’s not on them what happens. They’re just trying to get through their day, and then someone decides to take an issue with them and threaten them.”

In the same vein, Kelly Pound, who frequents a nearby bus stop, offered her perspective on the situation. She pointed out that the incident could be a manifestation of the stress people are dealing with these days. “Everyone is feeling on edge these days. Sometimes it just tips people over,” she told the outlet.


In light of recent events such as a KFC employee being shot after informing a customer they had run out of corn, which of the following solutions do you believe would best help prevent similar instances in the future?

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

14 Comments

14 Comments

  1. Carol

    August 26, 2024 at 11:35 am

    Really doesn’t matter what the reason. Shooting someone over a trivial issue puts the blame firmly on the shooter, not the KFC employee, and not the weapon. If this assh*le had hit him with a rock he is still to blame for the incident. What an idiotic reason to injury someone else. I wonder, tho, why somebody didn’t dial 911 before the aggressor got the chance to do ANYthing. Also, quick lesson for the employee; call a cop first and don’t give this fool a target. Didn’t turn out very well. But, I hope you learned that a pissing match doesn’t solve anything. Sure hope there isn’t some kind of loophole that lets this maniac out on bail to hurt someone else.

  2. Leon Redbone

    August 26, 2024 at 11:39 am

    They need to catch this guy and arrest him on attempted homicide. Stricter laws for criminals who threaten the lives of others needs to be enforced. Hold them without any bail and send them away for a long time. We need prosecutors with a back bone.

    • Timothy

      August 26, 2024 at 8:35 pm

      I’m sure this was NOT his first crime. IT sure as hell, should be his/them’s last. must be KILLED. Growing corn is hard work.

  3. Donnie

    August 26, 2024 at 11:46 am

    Unfortunately there are too many DA’s that fail to prosecute and turn violent offenders back out into the streets

  4. Beverly Lawrence

    August 26, 2024 at 12:02 pm

    If you take guns away from honest citizens, then only bad guys have guns! Taking guns is not the complete answer. Maybe those fast shooting bullet guns!
    All people working anywhere today should have a plan if a violent person shows up at their place of business. What will the call to action be. Practice it! Do a drill weekly!

  5. Roland

    August 26, 2024 at 12:35 pm

    This just like most violent crimes could be avoided and or made much less likely to happen , if the existing laws are strictly enforced with out the bleeding heart morons whining that punishment are to strict. If the punishment for committing a crime is not detouring people from committing a specific crime then the punishment is not adequate. There are way to many laws. Many laws are redundant but if not applied they are meaningless. When people object to a punishment being to severe it usually is because these same people are in fear of receiving this punishment. And rather than not committing these crimes to avoid the punishment they would much prefer to get rid of the punishment.

  6. Mark

    August 26, 2024 at 12:36 pm

    Make them take IQ test before ordering.

  7. JOan

    August 26, 2024 at 1:15 pm

    These animals were brought up to do this sort of thing. I would bet the animal has been in trouble before, but just got a slap on the paws. He has no control and the media doesn’t help. Goes back to look at Floyd. He is was an animal. You can’t pat these animals on the head and let them go.

  8. tom cain

    August 26, 2024 at 3:09 pm

    The Kid should not have escalated the incident by confronting the “crazy” guy in his car. Nothing would have escalated if the kid got a manager to apologize to the customer!!!

  9. Robert

    August 26, 2024 at 5:28 pm

    This was undoubtedly an unstable person who had probably showed indications of such and no one bothered to report their observation. Workers, of course, should be cautioned about how involved they should become before calling for law enforcement help.

  10. Marla Summers

    August 26, 2024 at 6:15 pm

    Why did the worker go outside to confront this obvious irrate customer? 911 should have been called after the brandishing if the firearm. Wishing the worker well but 20.00hr even @ fast food restaurant is not worth your life.

    • Bill Stephens

      August 26, 2024 at 7:09 pm

      I wonder as well. The worker never should have gone outside. He is as much to blame for his injury as the guy who pulled the trigger. Both are hotheads.

  11. Mary Jo P.

    August 27, 2024 at 7:30 am

    I think training needs to be given to these workers concerning violent customers. Maybe then the worker would have called 911 or at least consulted with his supervisor before going out to solve the problem on his own. Also, I do think there should be harsher laws about assaulting employees of a business. It just shows how “on edge” people are nowadays, but there are just some people who are bullies, especially to younger people, and they should never get away with it. They should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, especially in this case. How about “attempted murder?” or a felony so he can’t have a gun!!!

  12. James P.

    August 27, 2024 at 7:37 pm

    Sticter Gun Laws is not the answer (its the easy answer for lazy pandering elites).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Preparedness

German Activist Fined After Surviving Brutal Attack at Rally

Published

on

In a striking turn of events, a German activist known for his vocal criticism of political Islam has been fined by a regional court, following an attack on him earlier this year. Michael Stürzenberger, an activist with the Citizens’ Movement, Pax Europa, was among those injured during a stabbing spree by an Afghan migrant at an anti-jihad rally in Mannheim on May 31. The violent incident left him with severe injuries, including a stab wound to the thigh and a “gaping open wound” on his face.

Despite these traumatic events, Stürzenberger found himself facing legal repercussions for statements made at a rally in 2020. The Hamburg District Court had initially sentenced him to six months in prison for incitement, a decision that he appealed. Although the sentence was later suspended, the court ultimately upheld the conviction, imposing a fine of $3,804.65.

The charges against Stürzenberger stemmed from his comments on German immigration policy and his critique of political Islam. At the rally, he had pointed out that Muslim migrants from certain regions were disproportionately involved in crimes, and emphasized the need to address the influence of political Islam on women’s rights.

Stürzenberger clarified his stance, stating, “I have always spoken about political Islam. Always said: It is not against Muslims!” He further explained, “My criticism is only directed against the dangerous components of the ideology and those radicals who commit acts of violence as a result of it.”

The activist’s conviction is part of a broader trend in Germany, where individuals have faced legal consequences for expressing concerns about the impacts of mass immigration. This has been a contentious issue, especially as reports indicate a rise in violent crimes linked to immigrant populations.

German Interior Minister Nancy Faeser recently acknowledged challenges associated with young men of migrant backgrounds, who are often involved in acts of violence. She emphasized the need for effective education and integration programs to address these issues.

The situation has further highlighted safety concerns in German cities, with certain areas becoming increasingly unsafe for minorities. Berlin’s chief of police, Barbara Slowik, advised caution for individuals in specific neighborhoods, particularly those with significant Arab populations.

These developments underscore the complexities and tensions surrounding immigration and integration in Germany. As the country grapples with these issues, the case of Michael Stürzenberger serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between free expression and the need to address hate speech.


How should countries balance personal safety, free speech, and legal rights in cases involving criticism of religious or political groups?

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

Preparedness

Clerk’s Quick Reaction Sparks Debate on Self-Defense Rights

Published

on

In a recent incident that has sparked considerable debate, a New Orleans convenience store clerk fatally shot a 16-year-old armed robber during an attempted robbery. The event unfolded when two armed individuals entered the store, demanding cash. Surveillance footage captured 16-year-old Cecil Batiz pointing a gun with an extended magazine at the clerk working at the cell phone counter of Sam’s Meat Market.

As the situation escalated, Batiz was seen stuffing cash and other items into his pockets. The other suspect, 18-year-old Teony Juarez, was wearing a black ski mask. As the suspects attempted to leave the store, the clerk retrieved a firearm and discharged it, striking Batiz in the abdomen, causing him to collapse. The surveillance video further showed the clerk stepping out of camera view, only to return moments later and fire additional shots at Batiz as he lay on the store floor. Batiz succumbed to his injuries later at a hospital.

Juarez, in the midst of the chaos, returned fire and sustained an injury to his right forearm while fleeing the scene. An unidentified woman transported Juarez to a hospital, where he was treated and subsequently arrested. Juarez faces multiple charges, including armed robbery, aggravated battery, and illegal use of a weapon, with his bond set at $170,000.

The store clerk has not been charged, and Loyola Law Professor Dane Ciolino expressed skepticism about the likelihood of charges being filed.
“That clerk was in an obviously high-stress situation and saw the perpetrator still moving with a gun, and it’s hard to second-guess his decision to use deadly force yet again.”

Ciolino also clarified that under Louisiana law, Juarez cannot be charged for Batiz’s death, as the fatal act was committed by the victim, not a co-felon.

Orleans Parish District Attorney Jason Williams refrained from delving into case specifics but remarked,
“Once somebody puts a gun in your face, the rules change.”
He further noted,
“It’s painfully obvious to anyone who saw that video what those two people were doing in that store, and that shop owner did not ask for that exchange.”

Williams, who was elected in December 2020 with support from a PAC funded by George Soros, has recently undergone a shift in perspective regarding crime and punishment. This change came after a personal experience where he and his 78-year-old mother were victims of a carjacking. Following the incident, Williams recused himself from the carjacking case and acknowledged a transformation in his views, even reversing some of his previous campaign promises.


Should store clerks have the right to use a firearm in self-defense if threatened with a gun during a robbery?

Watch a local news report about the incident below:

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

Preparedness

Daring Homeowner Defends Home Against Burglar, Ignites Wild Police Chase

Published

on

In a dramatic sequence of events in Sacramento, California, a homeowner took action against a suspected burglar, setting off a chain of incidents that culminated in a high-speed police chase. The Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office reported the initial burglary attempt occurred around 3 p.m. on Chandler Drive in south Sacramento.

Amar Gandhi, a spokesperson for the sheriff’s department, described the suspect as a “lifelong criminal” with a history spanning over two decades. “Theft charges, gun charges, drug charges — you name it, he’s got everything under the sun,” Gandhi remarked, highlighting the suspect’s extensive criminal past.

The alleged thief, identified as 40-year-old Emelio Correa, attempted to force his way into a home. Despite the family’s efforts to deter him by shouting for him to leave, Correa persisted. Authorities revealed that the homeowner, a legal gun owner, fired at least one shot, striking Correa in the hand. Blood evidence was reportedly left at the scene.

The confrontation left a visible mark, with police investigating a front-entrance window that bore a large bullet hole. However, the incident did not end there.

Correa managed to enter a different residence shortly after. The owner of this second home, Cuong Nguyen, explained that the suspect gained access because the front door had been inadvertently left unlocked. Once inside, Correa found keys on a truck’s front seat in the garage.

Nguyen, who was not present during the break-in, recounted how Correa drove the truck through the garage door, leaving half of it “in the middle of the street” upon Nguyen’s return. This theft led to a high-speed pursuit on Highway 99.

The chase concluded when Correa encountered spike strips near Arno Road, causing the truck to roll into a ditch. He was subsequently taken into custody.

Correa suffered minor injuries and is currently held in Sacramento County jail on a $100,000 bond. He faces four felony charges and is scheduled to appear in court on Tuesday.

The incident underscores the importance of home security and the unpredictable nature of criminal activity, as even a brief lapse in vigilance can lead to significant consequences.


Should homeowners have the right to use firearms to defend their property against suspected burglars?

Watch a local news report about the incident below:

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

Trending

" "