Connect with us

Preparedness

Philadelphia Woman Fends Off Fake Cops, Leaves One Dead, One Injured

Published

on

An alleged home invasion in Philadelphia took a deadly turn. According to Pennsylvania police, a woman and her boyfriend had just returned to her first-floor apartment on Chestnut, when they were ambushed by three armed men. The woman, demonstrating remarkable courage and quick thinking, managed to fire back, leaving one intruder dead and another injured.

Unpredictable danger came knocking when the woman and her boyfriend were accosted by the three men. Allegedly masquerading as police officers, with at least one of them sporting a badge around his neck, the intruders were able to surprise the couple. A brief scuffle ensued, during which a staggering 13 shots were exchanged.

The end result was devastating for the intruders. One of the assailants, a 32-year-old, was discovered in a bedroom. His injuries, which included a gunshot wound to the head and multiple chest wounds, proved fatal. He was declared dead on the scene. In the chaos, a second man managed to escape through a back door, but not before sustaining gunshot injuries to his shoulder. He later sought treatment at Mercy Hospital.

“He was arrested,” the police reported, but there was no additional information regarding the third unidentified intruder who made a successful escape.

Aaron Allen, a neighbor, shared his perspective with KYW-TV. He revealed that the woman had moved into the home with her family about a year before the incident. “She don’t bother nobody,” Allen stated. He expressed his concerns about the increasingly violent society, “People so mean. You don’t know what people might do.”

“Carrying guns and she probably was trying to defend herself and I don’t blame her,” he added.

Another neighbor, Tressy Wilson, echoed the sentiments of shock and fear. Having been assaulted in the same area, she admitted that the recent shooting was a chilling reminder of the ever-present danger. “That’s shocking. It makes no sense,” she said.

“I stay to myself. I’m scared to go to work. I’m scared to go home,” Wilson added. “Now you scared to be in your own house.”

Following the incident, the woman has been cooperating with the police. Questions have been raised regarding the nature of the relationship between the woman and the intruders. Initial reports revealed that the woman claimed not to know any of the assailants and was clueless as to why they targeted her.

The investigation is ongoing and it remains unclear whether the woman will face charges for her actions in self-defense.


Do you believe homeowners should have the right to use firearms in self-defense during a home invasion, as was the case in the recent Philadelphia incident?

Watch a local news report about the incident below:

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

6 Comments

6 Comments

  1. Tommy Rhea

    June 8, 2024 at 11:26 am

    Too many predators wanting too many victims.

  2. Tig

    June 8, 2024 at 12:54 pm

    The unfortunate outcome here is that all three perps didn’t leave in a body bag. That’s the only thing that Thug Nation understands…

  3. Jerry Griffin

    June 8, 2024 at 4:27 pm

    Everyone should have the right of self defense with a gun but be required to have training on how to use it safely and mandatory Monthly shooting practice this is not just for personal safety but national security

  4. Danny Phillips

    June 8, 2024 at 11:42 pm

    If you come home and find somebody in your house no matter who it is you should be able to shoot them. And if the police come in with a no knock warrant you should be allowed to shoot them too.

  5. Michael

    June 9, 2024 at 10:56 am

    When any one breaks into your home your life is in danger . You have no reason to even think they may not harm you or yours . And when it is done while pretending to be police it’s even more dangerous because they are trying to make you compliant and fearful of taking any action . This tactic has been used many times it was also used to rob and kill every one in the house . That is also why the use and over use of no knock warrants are so dangerous to the occupants as well as the police . Smashing into a home in the middle of the night or wee hours of the morning with 1/2 a dozen or more people screaming only adds to the chaos and confusion . But in this case it seems to be clear they had every reason to believe their lives were in danger and every right to use deadly force .

  6. DEE

    June 10, 2024 at 5:24 am

    YES, AN AMERICAN CITIZEN SHOULD KILL ANYONE WHO TRESPASSES, AND/OR TRIES TO ENTER ONE’S PROPERTY OR HOME.
    ESPECIALLY TODAY WHEN WE HAVE PEOPLE HERE WHO ARE TERRORISTS, FOREIGNERS, CRIMINALS, KILLERS, DRUGGIES, AND ON AND ON.
    WE DO NOT KNOW ANY OF THESE PEOPLE, WHERE THEY COME FROM, BUT WE DO KNOW THEY ARE DESPERATE ABD SINE ARE UBSABE ABD VUCIOUS TOWRD AMERICANS.
    THEREFORE, WE NEED TO PROTECT OURSELVES, NO ONE ELSE WILL PROTECT US AND OUR FAMILIES, NOT EVEN OUR GOVERNMENT.
    SO WE NEED TO PROTECT OURSELVES, AND OUR CHILDREN, OUR FAMILIES, AND OUR PROPERTIES.

    THIS IS A US AGAINST THEM. THEY DO NOT BELONG HERE ANYWAY. IF THEY LOSE THEIR LIVES, WELL, THAT IS THEIR OWN FAULT FOR COMING HERE AND TRYING TO DESTROY US AND OUR COUNTRY.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Preparedness

German Activist Fined After Surviving Brutal Attack at Rally

Published

on

In a striking turn of events, a German activist known for his vocal criticism of political Islam has been fined by a regional court, following an attack on him earlier this year. Michael Stürzenberger, an activist with the Citizens’ Movement, Pax Europa, was among those injured during a stabbing spree by an Afghan migrant at an anti-jihad rally in Mannheim on May 31. The violent incident left him with severe injuries, including a stab wound to the thigh and a “gaping open wound” on his face.

Despite these traumatic events, Stürzenberger found himself facing legal repercussions for statements made at a rally in 2020. The Hamburg District Court had initially sentenced him to six months in prison for incitement, a decision that he appealed. Although the sentence was later suspended, the court ultimately upheld the conviction, imposing a fine of $3,804.65.

The charges against Stürzenberger stemmed from his comments on German immigration policy and his critique of political Islam. At the rally, he had pointed out that Muslim migrants from certain regions were disproportionately involved in crimes, and emphasized the need to address the influence of political Islam on women’s rights.

Stürzenberger clarified his stance, stating, “I have always spoken about political Islam. Always said: It is not against Muslims!” He further explained, “My criticism is only directed against the dangerous components of the ideology and those radicals who commit acts of violence as a result of it.”

The activist’s conviction is part of a broader trend in Germany, where individuals have faced legal consequences for expressing concerns about the impacts of mass immigration. This has been a contentious issue, especially as reports indicate a rise in violent crimes linked to immigrant populations.

German Interior Minister Nancy Faeser recently acknowledged challenges associated with young men of migrant backgrounds, who are often involved in acts of violence. She emphasized the need for effective education and integration programs to address these issues.

The situation has further highlighted safety concerns in German cities, with certain areas becoming increasingly unsafe for minorities. Berlin’s chief of police, Barbara Slowik, advised caution for individuals in specific neighborhoods, particularly those with significant Arab populations.

These developments underscore the complexities and tensions surrounding immigration and integration in Germany. As the country grapples with these issues, the case of Michael Stürzenberger serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between free expression and the need to address hate speech.


How should countries balance personal safety, free speech, and legal rights in cases involving criticism of religious or political groups?

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

Preparedness

Clerk’s Quick Reaction Sparks Debate on Self-Defense Rights

Published

on

In a recent incident that has sparked considerable debate, a New Orleans convenience store clerk fatally shot a 16-year-old armed robber during an attempted robbery. The event unfolded when two armed individuals entered the store, demanding cash. Surveillance footage captured 16-year-old Cecil Batiz pointing a gun with an extended magazine at the clerk working at the cell phone counter of Sam’s Meat Market.

As the situation escalated, Batiz was seen stuffing cash and other items into his pockets. The other suspect, 18-year-old Teony Juarez, was wearing a black ski mask. As the suspects attempted to leave the store, the clerk retrieved a firearm and discharged it, striking Batiz in the abdomen, causing him to collapse. The surveillance video further showed the clerk stepping out of camera view, only to return moments later and fire additional shots at Batiz as he lay on the store floor. Batiz succumbed to his injuries later at a hospital.

Juarez, in the midst of the chaos, returned fire and sustained an injury to his right forearm while fleeing the scene. An unidentified woman transported Juarez to a hospital, where he was treated and subsequently arrested. Juarez faces multiple charges, including armed robbery, aggravated battery, and illegal use of a weapon, with his bond set at $170,000.

The store clerk has not been charged, and Loyola Law Professor Dane Ciolino expressed skepticism about the likelihood of charges being filed.
“That clerk was in an obviously high-stress situation and saw the perpetrator still moving with a gun, and it’s hard to second-guess his decision to use deadly force yet again.”

Ciolino also clarified that under Louisiana law, Juarez cannot be charged for Batiz’s death, as the fatal act was committed by the victim, not a co-felon.

Orleans Parish District Attorney Jason Williams refrained from delving into case specifics but remarked,
“Once somebody puts a gun in your face, the rules change.”
He further noted,
“It’s painfully obvious to anyone who saw that video what those two people were doing in that store, and that shop owner did not ask for that exchange.”

Williams, who was elected in December 2020 with support from a PAC funded by George Soros, has recently undergone a shift in perspective regarding crime and punishment. This change came after a personal experience where he and his 78-year-old mother were victims of a carjacking. Following the incident, Williams recused himself from the carjacking case and acknowledged a transformation in his views, even reversing some of his previous campaign promises.


Should store clerks have the right to use a firearm in self-defense if threatened with a gun during a robbery?

Watch a local news report about the incident below:

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

Preparedness

Daring Homeowner Defends Home Against Burglar, Ignites Wild Police Chase

Published

on

In a dramatic sequence of events in Sacramento, California, a homeowner took action against a suspected burglar, setting off a chain of incidents that culminated in a high-speed police chase. The Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office reported the initial burglary attempt occurred around 3 p.m. on Chandler Drive in south Sacramento.

Amar Gandhi, a spokesperson for the sheriff’s department, described the suspect as a “lifelong criminal” with a history spanning over two decades. “Theft charges, gun charges, drug charges — you name it, he’s got everything under the sun,” Gandhi remarked, highlighting the suspect’s extensive criminal past.

The alleged thief, identified as 40-year-old Emelio Correa, attempted to force his way into a home. Despite the family’s efforts to deter him by shouting for him to leave, Correa persisted. Authorities revealed that the homeowner, a legal gun owner, fired at least one shot, striking Correa in the hand. Blood evidence was reportedly left at the scene.

The confrontation left a visible mark, with police investigating a front-entrance window that bore a large bullet hole. However, the incident did not end there.

Correa managed to enter a different residence shortly after. The owner of this second home, Cuong Nguyen, explained that the suspect gained access because the front door had been inadvertently left unlocked. Once inside, Correa found keys on a truck’s front seat in the garage.

Nguyen, who was not present during the break-in, recounted how Correa drove the truck through the garage door, leaving half of it “in the middle of the street” upon Nguyen’s return. This theft led to a high-speed pursuit on Highway 99.

The chase concluded when Correa encountered spike strips near Arno Road, causing the truck to roll into a ditch. He was subsequently taken into custody.

Correa suffered minor injuries and is currently held in Sacramento County jail on a $100,000 bond. He faces four felony charges and is scheduled to appear in court on Tuesday.

The incident underscores the importance of home security and the unpredictable nature of criminal activity, as even a brief lapse in vigilance can lead to significant consequences.


Should homeowners have the right to use firearms to defend their property against suspected burglars?

Watch a local news report about the incident below:

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

Trending

" "