Connect with us

Preparedness

DC Shooter Granted Home Arrest — Public Safety or Personal Interest?

Published

on

In an unexpected legal turn of events in Washington, D.C., a young man of 18 years, Amonte Moody, who was reported to have recklessly fired dozens of shots on a city street, has surprisingly been granted pre-trial home arrest. This decision of the court comes despite the apparent danger the gun-firing incident posed to the public at large.

Late at night on April 22nd, Moody is alleged to have swiftly emerged from his residence on Independence Avenue SE, roughly a mile and a half from the U.S. Capitol, and recklessly fired numerous shots down the street. This was captured in footage from two Ring cameras.

Though the camera footage does not directly reveal Moody’s intended target, there have been suggestions that the flurry of bullets was aimed at a vehicle transporting four individuals. By sheer luck, there was no report of any injuries from the incident.

Upon arriving at the scene, the police are reported to have discovered 26 spent shell casings on the street and a disassembled AR-15 hidden in the ceiling of Moody’s home. Moody was arrested and was later charged with felony endangerment with a firearm and possession of a firearm in the commission of a violent crime.

Even with the severity of the incident and the collected incriminating evidence, on May 3rd, Magistrate Judge Lloyd Nolan approved a pre-trial release and home arrest for Moody in nearby Maryland. This arrangement requires Moody to wear an ankle monitor and prohibits contact with the passengers of the vehicle he allegedly targeted.

Denise Krepp, a local attorney and previous chief counsel for the U.S. Maritime Administration under President Barack Obama, spoke with Blaze News about the court’s decision, labeling it as “insanity.”

“Where are the grown-ups?” Krepp asked rhetorically about the D. C.-area justice system. “Where are the real grown-ups?”

Krepp further noted that D.C. judges have the flexibility to remand violent suspects to jail, but they often choose to release them, putting personal interests ahead of public safety.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office in D.C. shares the same sentiment of outrage regarding Judge Nolan’s decision. In a move to overturn the verdict, prosecutors called for an emergency hearing on Monday.

“The defendant unloaded an AR-15 into the middle of a public, residential street. The defendant fired 26 rounds, littering the street with shell casings. Anyone who happened to walk into that street at that moment could have been killed as an innocent bystander. Everyone in the car the defendant targeted was at risk. Every resident of that street was at risk,” read a part of the USAO’s filing.


Do you agree with the judge's decision to grant pre-trial home arrest to the teen who allegedly open-fired on a DC street?

Watch a local news report about the incident below:

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

6 Comments

6 Comments

  1. Bret

    May 12, 2024 at 11:19 am

    The perpetrator was black and his attempted victims were on the right. Simple.

  2. Jeff Boggs

    May 12, 2024 at 1:21 pm

    Allowing thugs to continue roaming the streets is a recipe for Federal/State Authorities to announce Marshall Law in America.
    MARK MY WORDS.

  3. Daniel Quigley

    May 12, 2024 at 2:03 pm

    This is why DC has been called the City where the children rule. When Adults are in positions to keep Criminals off the street it’s been proven that Crime and Shootings drop dramatically. But in cities where the Children Rule its Armageddon with people being killed with the Criminals using Bricks,Knives,Machetes, Hammers and yes even Guns to rule those Blue Cities. It used to be if a Gun was used in a Crime or Criminal Act you got the Monopoly Charge of ” Go to Jail,Go Directly to Jail!!” Now it’s a open door policy of unless you kill a Politician’s Friend your out before the ink dries on the Police Paperwork. We thought it was bad when those Democrat Governor’s opened the Jails and Prisons during Covid, sadly that was just the warm up of rampant Crime. Now we have a Screen Door securing our Southern Border and every country on this Earth opening up their Jails and Prisons and flying those Criminals to Mexico knowing the United States will take them all in. Let’s just hope the Thugs start getting smart and start cleaning out the Politician’s that have allowed this unstoppable Crime wave to begin

  4. paul

    May 12, 2024 at 6:25 pm

    He’s not a child, he’s an ADULT! Treat him as such, and haul his dumb a$$ to jail! Any indication that he’s gat a loooong rap sheet? I’ll bet this ain’t his first run in with the law! If it had been me, they would have hauled me off and thrown away the key, and I’ve never been arrested!

  5. Rand

    May 14, 2024 at 6:37 pm

    Which is more egregious? An idiot black adult , shooting a firearm at “WHAT?” , or the announcer stating ,”beware, there is gunfire”. There is silly democrats who only “uphold laws that suit them”>. Even OLD BARAK said the boy/man should have been in jail. How did he get a firearm in “Anti-gun Washington D.C.”???? WHAT! RESTRICTIVE gun laws that are on the books don’t work? Or, is that only for “White perpetrators , white legal and law abiding citizens” that get their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS stripped by democrat judges.

  6. Tim

    May 15, 2024 at 4:16 pm

    when socialist run the gov’t. and more blacks die (mostly yankees), who am I to complain

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Preparedness

German Activist Fined After Surviving Brutal Attack at Rally

Published

on

In a striking turn of events, a German activist known for his vocal criticism of political Islam has been fined by a regional court, following an attack on him earlier this year. Michael Stürzenberger, an activist with the Citizens’ Movement, Pax Europa, was among those injured during a stabbing spree by an Afghan migrant at an anti-jihad rally in Mannheim on May 31. The violent incident left him with severe injuries, including a stab wound to the thigh and a “gaping open wound” on his face.

Despite these traumatic events, Stürzenberger found himself facing legal repercussions for statements made at a rally in 2020. The Hamburg District Court had initially sentenced him to six months in prison for incitement, a decision that he appealed. Although the sentence was later suspended, the court ultimately upheld the conviction, imposing a fine of $3,804.65.

The charges against Stürzenberger stemmed from his comments on German immigration policy and his critique of political Islam. At the rally, he had pointed out that Muslim migrants from certain regions were disproportionately involved in crimes, and emphasized the need to address the influence of political Islam on women’s rights.

Stürzenberger clarified his stance, stating, “I have always spoken about political Islam. Always said: It is not against Muslims!” He further explained, “My criticism is only directed against the dangerous components of the ideology and those radicals who commit acts of violence as a result of it.”

The activist’s conviction is part of a broader trend in Germany, where individuals have faced legal consequences for expressing concerns about the impacts of mass immigration. This has been a contentious issue, especially as reports indicate a rise in violent crimes linked to immigrant populations.

German Interior Minister Nancy Faeser recently acknowledged challenges associated with young men of migrant backgrounds, who are often involved in acts of violence. She emphasized the need for effective education and integration programs to address these issues.

The situation has further highlighted safety concerns in German cities, with certain areas becoming increasingly unsafe for minorities. Berlin’s chief of police, Barbara Slowik, advised caution for individuals in specific neighborhoods, particularly those with significant Arab populations.

These developments underscore the complexities and tensions surrounding immigration and integration in Germany. As the country grapples with these issues, the case of Michael Stürzenberger serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between free expression and the need to address hate speech.


How should countries balance personal safety, free speech, and legal rights in cases involving criticism of religious or political groups?

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

Preparedness

Clerk’s Quick Reaction Sparks Debate on Self-Defense Rights

Published

on

In a recent incident that has sparked considerable debate, a New Orleans convenience store clerk fatally shot a 16-year-old armed robber during an attempted robbery. The event unfolded when two armed individuals entered the store, demanding cash. Surveillance footage captured 16-year-old Cecil Batiz pointing a gun with an extended magazine at the clerk working at the cell phone counter of Sam’s Meat Market.

As the situation escalated, Batiz was seen stuffing cash and other items into his pockets. The other suspect, 18-year-old Teony Juarez, was wearing a black ski mask. As the suspects attempted to leave the store, the clerk retrieved a firearm and discharged it, striking Batiz in the abdomen, causing him to collapse. The surveillance video further showed the clerk stepping out of camera view, only to return moments later and fire additional shots at Batiz as he lay on the store floor. Batiz succumbed to his injuries later at a hospital.

Juarez, in the midst of the chaos, returned fire and sustained an injury to his right forearm while fleeing the scene. An unidentified woman transported Juarez to a hospital, where he was treated and subsequently arrested. Juarez faces multiple charges, including armed robbery, aggravated battery, and illegal use of a weapon, with his bond set at $170,000.

The store clerk has not been charged, and Loyola Law Professor Dane Ciolino expressed skepticism about the likelihood of charges being filed.
“That clerk was in an obviously high-stress situation and saw the perpetrator still moving with a gun, and it’s hard to second-guess his decision to use deadly force yet again.”

Ciolino also clarified that under Louisiana law, Juarez cannot be charged for Batiz’s death, as the fatal act was committed by the victim, not a co-felon.

Orleans Parish District Attorney Jason Williams refrained from delving into case specifics but remarked,
“Once somebody puts a gun in your face, the rules change.”
He further noted,
“It’s painfully obvious to anyone who saw that video what those two people were doing in that store, and that shop owner did not ask for that exchange.”

Williams, who was elected in December 2020 with support from a PAC funded by George Soros, has recently undergone a shift in perspective regarding crime and punishment. This change came after a personal experience where he and his 78-year-old mother were victims of a carjacking. Following the incident, Williams recused himself from the carjacking case and acknowledged a transformation in his views, even reversing some of his previous campaign promises.


Should store clerks have the right to use a firearm in self-defense if threatened with a gun during a robbery?

Watch a local news report about the incident below:

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

Preparedness

Daring Homeowner Defends Home Against Burglar, Ignites Wild Police Chase

Published

on

In a dramatic sequence of events in Sacramento, California, a homeowner took action against a suspected burglar, setting off a chain of incidents that culminated in a high-speed police chase. The Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office reported the initial burglary attempt occurred around 3 p.m. on Chandler Drive in south Sacramento.

Amar Gandhi, a spokesperson for the sheriff’s department, described the suspect as a “lifelong criminal” with a history spanning over two decades. “Theft charges, gun charges, drug charges — you name it, he’s got everything under the sun,” Gandhi remarked, highlighting the suspect’s extensive criminal past.

The alleged thief, identified as 40-year-old Emelio Correa, attempted to force his way into a home. Despite the family’s efforts to deter him by shouting for him to leave, Correa persisted. Authorities revealed that the homeowner, a legal gun owner, fired at least one shot, striking Correa in the hand. Blood evidence was reportedly left at the scene.

The confrontation left a visible mark, with police investigating a front-entrance window that bore a large bullet hole. However, the incident did not end there.

Correa managed to enter a different residence shortly after. The owner of this second home, Cuong Nguyen, explained that the suspect gained access because the front door had been inadvertently left unlocked. Once inside, Correa found keys on a truck’s front seat in the garage.

Nguyen, who was not present during the break-in, recounted how Correa drove the truck through the garage door, leaving half of it “in the middle of the street” upon Nguyen’s return. This theft led to a high-speed pursuit on Highway 99.

The chase concluded when Correa encountered spike strips near Arno Road, causing the truck to roll into a ditch. He was subsequently taken into custody.

Correa suffered minor injuries and is currently held in Sacramento County jail on a $100,000 bond. He faces four felony charges and is scheduled to appear in court on Tuesday.

The incident underscores the importance of home security and the unpredictable nature of criminal activity, as even a brief lapse in vigilance can lead to significant consequences.


Should homeowners have the right to use firearms to defend their property against suspected burglars?

Watch a local news report about the incident below:

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

Trending

" "