Survival Stories
Zuckerberg’s Hawaiian Fortress: Apocalypse Bunker or Billionaire Feudalism?

In the closing month of 2023, WIRED unveiled that Mark Zuckerberg, the billionaire mastermind behind Meta and a key player in our social media-centric society, has been acquiring significant portions of the Hawaiian island Kauai. Alongside his wife, Priscilla Chan, Zuckerberg is developing a colossal estate, known as Ko’olau Ranch, which is projected to cost upwards of A$400 million to finalize.
This sprawling property, spanning over 5,500,000 square metres, is encased by a two-metre wall and is under the watchful eyes of numerous security personnel patrolling the nearby beaches on quad bikes. Zuckerberg’s Hawaiian property employs hundreds of local Hawaiians, although the exact number and their roles remain undisclosed due to a binding nondisclosure agreement.
“Zuckerberg’s Ko’olau Ranch includes plans for a “massive underground bunker”.”
This detail has sparked intrigue among reporters and conspiracy theorists alike, leading to questions such as “Why is Mark Zuckerberg building a private apocalypse bunker in Hawaii?” and “What do the [billionaires] know?” and “What is going to happen in 2024 that they are not telling us?”.
Doomsday bunkers are becoming a familiar sight in contemporary US pop culture, with shows like The Last of Us and Tales from the Walking Dead, and films like Netflix’s Leave the World Behind, featuring them prominently. This, coupled with sensational headlines like “Billionaires’ Survivalist Bunkers Go Absolutely Bonkers With Fiery Moats and Water Cannons”, has stirred public interest in the growing bunker industry.
However, other aspects of Zuckerberg’s Kauai property may be more noteworthy: several oversized mansions, at least 11 treehouses interconnected by rope bridges, and machinery dedicated to water purification, desalination, and storage.
Zuckerberg, meanwhile, shares glimpses of his life on the ranch through “relatable” Instagram posts, such as images of him about to enjoy a large portion of grilled beef. He informs his followers that he’s now ranching his own cattle, feeding them with macadamia nuts grown on the ranch and beer brewed there as well.
“My daughters help plant the mac trees and take care of our different animals. We’re still early in the journey and it’s fun improving on it every season. Of all my projects, this is the most delicious.”
Zuckerberg and Chan have further plans for wildlife preservation, native plant restoration, organic turmeric and ginger farms, and collaborations with conservation experts in Kauai to preserve and protect the native flora and fauna. These activities will have a more significant impact on Kauai than the bunker, regardless of its size.
Zuckerberg isn’t the only billionaire building massive compounds in Hawaii. Oprah Winfrey bought a 163-acre estate in Maui in 2002, and has since acquired additional land, totaling over 650,000 square metres. Larry Ellison, co-founder of tech company Oracle, bought almost all of the Hawaiian island Lanai in 2012. Two years ago, billionaire Frank VanderSloot purchased a 2,000-acre ranch just south of Zuckerberg’s.
As these high net worth individuals move in, locals already living on the land are increasingly priced out or even forcibly displaced – a regrettable consequence of Hawaii’s complex land rights, where indigenous ownership and stewardship is often not legally recognized.
At first glance, these tycoons might seem to be “prepping” for a familiar 20th-century style apocalypse, as depicted in countless disaster movies. But they’re not.
Yes, their vast estates do include bunkers and other technologies traditionally associated with prepping. For example, the mansions of Ko’olau Ranch are connected through underground tunnels that feed into a large shelter.
However, Zuckerberg, Winfrey, Ellison and others are actually embarking on far more ambitious projects. They are seeking to create entirely self-sustaining ecosystems, in which land, agriculture, the built environment and labour are all controlled and managed by a single person, who has more in common with a mediaeval-era feudal lord than a 21st-century capitalist.
“In the feudal system of medieval Europe, the king owned almost everything, and everyone else’s property rights depended on their relationship with the king. Peasants lived on land granted by the king to a local lord, and workers didn’t always even own the tools they used for farming or other trades like carpentry and blacksmithing.” – Joshua A. T. Fairfield, author of Owned: Property, Privacy and the New Digital Serfdom.
This is a stark contrast to earlier attempts by billionaires to build bunkers to “escape” some future cataclysm. For instance, Peter Thiel, libertarian venture capitalist and PayPal co-founder, failed to build an elaborate, bunker-like underground lodge in Aotearoa New Zealand’s South Island, due to conflicts with the local council.
What we see with Zuckerberg’s project isn’t an overt conflict between billionaire and community. In Kauai, members of a community have consented, or conceded, to grant a plutocrat the stewardship of their land, in the name of preservation. This is a business model that leads directly (back) to feudalism.
The media’s obsession with the “craziest features” of Zuckerberg’s Hawaiian folly obscures a more significant trend among billionaires: a belief that survival depends not (only) on hiding out in a reinforced concrete hole in the ground, but (also) on developing, and controlling, an ecosystem of one’s own.
It’s easy to assume that, because some of the world’s richest people are buying up estates on remote islands and fitting them out with bunkers, they must be privy to some secret inside information. But the truth is simpler, and more brutal, than that. Billionaires are building elaborate properties … because they can.
Mark Zuckerberg’s net worth in 2024 is an almost unfathomable A$260 billion. A $400 million Hawaiian fortress, extravagant as it might be, represents less than 0.2% of his total wealth. This is comparable to a household with a net worth of $1,000,000 (the average net worth in Australia) spending just $1,540.
These calculations make it clear that members of the billionaire bunker club don’t have to “believe” in the likelihood of apocalypse or imminent social collapse in any committed or meaningful sense. Instead, since they have far more money than they know what to do with, they may as well use a small fraction of it to build underground fortresses.
For instance, Bill Gates, who owns at least eight properties in the US alone, is rumored to have underground security areas under every one of his homes.
On the other hand, the less disposable income someone has, the more any serious attempts to “prepare for the future” will disrupt their lives in the here and now.
Prepping culture makes little sense in countries like India or Cambodia or Yemen, where severe poverty is widespread and hundreds of millions of people are already surviving in conditions that might seem “apocalyptic” to privileged westerners.
For middle-class people who can’t afford to own multiple properties, a decision to live on a potentially “safe” island would necessitate moving there permanently, in the process passing up opportunities to earn income elsewhere.
If your disposable income is roughly $5,000 or $10,000 per year, and you hope to purchase a Rising S “Standard Bomb Shelter Base Model”, this would set you back a little over $150,000. You would have to dedicate your entire working life to this project.
Perhaps this is why, during the early weeks of lockdowns in 2020, there was a rush of ordinary people bulk-buying toilet paper. It was the least expensive, most convenient way to amass a significant-looking stockpile in a hurry. People could feel like they were “taking action” during an otherwise overwhelming situation.
Meanwhile, our obsession with the mega-bunkers of the mega-rich is part of a broader cultural trend, in which ordinary – read: poor – people pretend to make fun of “crazy” billionaires, while furtively aspiring to uber-wealthy status themselves.
This ideological shell game allows us to (fleetingly) acknowledge the damage runaway global inequality is doing to social cohesion and the viability of our ecosystems.
In a voyeuristic fantasy, we can project ourselves to the very top of the inequality pyramid, just for a moment. A convergence of industries that prey on our collective insecurities occurred in 2021, when Texan bunker salesman Ron Hubbard appeared on an episode of Keeping up with the Kardashians, and audiences got to watch Kim and Khloé go bunker shopping.
That the Australian public is fascinated by Zuckerberg and other billionaires’ spare mansions at a historical moment when our housing affordability crisis is reaching unprecedented levels is particularly telling, and galling.
Meanwhile, for the actual billionaires, bunkers are just a small part of a “diversified portfolio” of bets against the future.
Other well known schemes include investing in space travel, cryonics (freezing your body in the hopes of a future reincarnation), mind uploading, and in Peter Thiel’s case, flirting with parabiosis – transfusing young people’s blood into your own veins.
For billionaires, putting money into such projects doesn’t mean they’re crazy, or paranoid, or in possession of some special secret knowledge about the future. It simply means they’ve amassed such colossal surpluses of wealth, they may as well use it for something.
Our Thoughts
Mark Zuckerberg’s expansive Hawaiian estate, Ko’olau Ranch, is a testament to the excess of wealth and the increasing disparity between the world’s billionaires and the average person. While the media has focused on the sensational aspect of the “massive underground bunker”, it’s crucial to look beyond this detail and focus on the broader implications of this kind of wealth accumulation.
The fact that Zuckerberg and other billionaires like Oprah Winfrey and Larry Ellison can purchase large tracts of land and build self-sustaining ecosystems is indicative of a troubling trend. It’s not just about prepping for an apocalypse, it’s about creating a world entirely under their control. This approach harks back to the feudal system of medieval Europe, where the king owned almost everything and everyone else’s property rights depended on their relationship with the king.
While billionaires building extravagant properties is not necessarily indicative of secret knowledge about the future, it does reveal a concerning truth about our society. The wealth disparity is so vast that billionaires can afford to invest in these grandiose projects purely because they can.
At the same time, the average person struggles to prepare for the future without disrupting their present. This disparity further exacerbates social inequality and makes it increasingly difficult for the average person to secure a stable future.
The fascination with the mega-bunkers of the mega-rich is a distraction from the real issue at hand – the growing wealth disparity and its detrimental effects on social cohesion and the viability of our ecosystems. It’s high time we shift our focus from the sensational to the substantial and address the root cause of this issue.
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Survival Stories
Lost and Found: GPS Technology in Wilderness Rescues

As someone who’s spent a fair bit of time in the great outdoors, I’ve learned a thing or two about the importance of navigation. Now, I’m not talking about the kind you use to find the nearest gas station on a road trip. I’m talking about the kind that can mean the difference between life and death when you’re stranded in the wilderness. And in this day and age, that means understanding GPS technology.
GPS, or Global Positioning System, is a network of satellites that orbit the Earth, transmitting signals that can be picked up by devices on the ground. These signals are used to calculate the device’s exact location, anywhere in the world. It’s a powerful tool, and it’s revolutionizing the way we approach wilderness rescues.
When you’re lost in the wilderness, every minute counts. The longer you’re exposed to the elements, the greater your risk of hypothermia, dehydration, and injury. Traditional search and rescue methods can take hours, even days, to locate a lost individual. But with GPS, rescuers can pinpoint a person’s location in a matter of minutes.
GPS technology is not just about speed, though. It’s also about accuracy. In dense forests or rugged mountain terrain, it’s easy for rescuers to miss a person, even if they’re just a few feet away. But with GPS, they can zero in on a person’s exact location, reducing the risk of a missed rescue.
But here’s the thing: GPS technology is only as good as the device it’s used on. That’s why it’s so important to have a reliable, high-quality GPS device when you’re venturing into the wilderness. And no, I’m not talking about the GPS on your smartphone. While that might be fine for city navigation, it’s not designed to withstand the rigors of the great outdoors.
When choosing a GPS device, there are a few key features to look for. First and foremost, it should be rugged and waterproof, able to withstand drops, dust, and water. It should also have a long battery life, as you never know how long you’ll need it. And it should have a clear, easy-to-read display, so you can quickly and easily read your coordinates, even in harsh lighting conditions.
Another important feature is the ability to send and receive messages. Some GPS devices come equipped with two-way satellite communication, allowing you to send an SOS signal and communicate with rescuers in an emergency. This feature can be a literal lifesaver, enabling you to convey vital information about your condition and situation.
It’s also worth considering a device with mapping capabilities. Detailed topographic maps can help you navigate unfamiliar terrain and plan the safest route. And with some devices, you can even download maps and updates via satellite, so you’re always equipped with the most up-to-date information.
But remember, while GPS technology is an incredible tool, it’s not a substitute for knowledge and skills. You should still learn how to read a map and compass, understand basic survival skills, and know what to do in an emergency. Because when it comes down to it, technology can fail, but your knowledge and skills can’t.
So, whether you’re a seasoned adventurer or a weekend hiker, don’t underestimate the power of GPS technology. It could be the difference between being lost and being found. But remember, it’s just a tool. The real key to survival is you.
Survival Stories
Unmasking WASR-10: Affordable, Reliable AK Variant Review

The world of AK variants is as diverse as it is contentious, with every gun enthusiast seeming to have a firm opinion on which model reigns supreme. Among the cacophony of voices, one recommendation often rings out: “Just get a WASR!”
The Romanian-made WASR series has carved out a niche in the U.S. imported firearms market, often hailed as the gold standard of affordable AKs available in the country. Century Arms, one of the largest firearms importers in the U.S., attributes much of its success to the “massive demand” for the WASR.
The question that remains is whether the WASR lives up to its legendary reputation. Is it the go-to AK variant for those on a budget? To answer these questions, we’ll delve into our experiences with the rack-grade WASR-10 in 7.62×39, from firing and handling to a thorough inspection by a qualified AK gunsmith.
The WASR series, imported by Century Arms, is built by Cugir Arms Factory in Cugir, Romania. The factory has a rich history, evolving from an iron-processing facility established in 1799 in the hills of Transylvania. The WASR-10 is essentially a semi-automatic version of the Pistol Mitralieră model 1963 (PM md. 63), a licensed version of the Soviet AKM. With its simple wood furniture and well-known design, these Romanian rifles are a no-frills variant of the AKM.
The WASR we have today is the result of years of improvements. One of the most significant upgrades is the elimination of “trigger slap” in current models through an aftermarket trigger. This issue, which involves the bolt slapping back into the hammer as it travels, impacting the disconnector/trigger and snapping it back into the shooter’s trigger finger, is thankfully uncommon in modern AKs like the current WASR-10 offerings from Century.
Before testing, we had local AK expert Josh from Copperhead USA in Tempe, Arizona, inspect our WASR. It’s important to remember that AKs often require real gunsmithing, unlike other platforms where swapping internal components is relatively straightforward. AK tolerances can vary greatly, even from the same factories at different times. If you’re considering delving deeper into the AK platform, investing time and money in learning to be competent rather than just enthusiastic is well worth it.
Our WASR-10 was in good shape when we unboxed it, as expected from a basic imported AK. However, AKs require many parts to be pressed and/or riveted together, and if done incorrectly, it can lead to serious issues down the line. Josh checked the headspace, as it’s possible for an AK to fire out of battery, which can cause serious problems. Our WASR was found to have good headspace after appropriate gauging. Josh also noted that it had a tight chamber, which we’ll discuss later. It’s not uncommon to find a canted (i.e., tilted) front iron sight post on an imported AK, but luckily, our WASR’s sights were fine.
The rest of the issues were purely cosmetic, but it’s important to have some knowledge of the platform to make those distinctions. The gas block was slightly canted, and the slant brake muzzle device didn’t sit flush on the muzzle due to the detent retaining it being slightly too long. It appeared the bolt carrier had been dropped at some point, as there was a small ding on the top of the carrier just forward of the recoil spring assembly. The safety was also remarkably tight, even after bending it out, which is another common issue with many AKs.
The wood furniture was nothing special; in fact, it even manifested some unexpected issues during testing. The trigger was a typical spongy AK trigger with a tactile reset and a curved bow. Based on everything we saw, this wasn’t a cherry-picked rifle and is a good measure of what you can expect from a WASR-10.
Testing was straightforward — the best way to test a new rifle is to fire it. In particular, firing an AK with a tight chamber helps fit the bolt to the chamber, reducing that issue. We loaded 500 rounds of Red Army Standard steel case 7.62×39 ammo into four different types of mags for our break-in range day. These included US PALM AK30R magazines, XTech MAG47 polymer magazines with steel locking lugs, Magpul MOE magazines, and Bulgarian steel 30-round mags from GunMag Warehouse.
The first mags of all four types presented no issues. However, the second XTech mag failed to feed on the last round, which also set the bullet back in the casing far enough to make us discard that round. Other than that, the only magazine issue we experienced was difficulty seating them, which is a combination of needing to break in the mag release lever and the mags themselves.
As we fired round after round, the rifle’s entire barrel and handguard were rippling with heat and smoke, but it kept going. After firing 500 rounds of steel-case ammo in less than 30 minutes during our aggressive break-in test, the WASR-10 held up remarkably well. Sure, it had a few minor issues out of the box, but most were purely cosmetic, and none would be insurmountable without a minor repair or continued use to break in the components.
With an MSRP of $1,070, the WASR-10 from Century Arms isn’t the cheapest AK you can buy, but it remains one of the best value-for-money options on the market. If you’re shopping for your first AK or simply want a reliable, durable rifle, it’s worth considering. However, if you’re expecting a flawless finish, 1 MOA accuracy, and the ability to add a modern sighting system without purchasing an aftermarket mount, you might want to consider a different AK or even a different platform altogether.
AKs continue to be a staple of the American firearms market, even as prices rise. If you’re looking for an affordable, reliable, and fun-to-shoot AK, the WASR-10 from Century is a solid choice. As it turns out, its reputation is well-deserved.
Our Thoughts
The WASR-10 is indeed an interesting piece of hardware. Its reputation as a budget-friendly yet reliable AK variant is well-earned, as our experience suggests. The Romanian roots and the long history of the Cugir Arms Factory lend an air of authenticity that is hard to ignore.
The AK platform is not without its challenges, as indicated by the need for real gunsmithing. That said, the WASR-10 seems to have overcome many of these issues, thanks to years of improvements. The elimination of the “trigger slap” is a significant enhancement, making the WASR-10 a more user-friendly option for AK enthusiasts.
We appreciate the thorough inspection by our local AK expert, Josh. It’s a reminder that a well-built AK requires careful assembly and the right expertise. The WASR-10 passed the test with flying colors, only showing minor cosmetic issues that don’t affect its functionality.
The WASR-10’s performance during testing was commendable, holding up well despite the aggressive break-in test. This robustness, coupled with its affordability, makes it an attractive option for those seeking a reliable AK variant.
It’s worth noting that the WASR-10 isn’t for everyone. If you’re after a flawless finish, pinpoint accuracy, or the ability to add a modern sighting system without additional expenditure, you might want to look elsewhere. However, for those seeking an affordable, reliable, and enjoyable AK experience, the WASR-10 is a solid choice, and its reputation is well-deserved.
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
Survival Stories
Master Urban Defense: Learn from History And Prepare for Future Wars

In the intricate dance of contemporary warfare, the urban landscape often serves as the stage. The past and present suggest that future conflicts will inevitably seep into the arteries of our cities, necessitating a deep understanding of urban defense strategies. This notion is investigated by John Spencer and Jayson Geroux of the Modern War Institute at the West Point Military Academy. They assert, “if leveraged effectively, a solid urban defense can decisively tip the scales of war.”
Urban environments are complex mazes of buildings, streets, and alleys, creating a unique battlefield that differs greatly from open fields or forests. Historic urban battles, such as the renowned Battle of Stalingrad or the struggle for Mosul, provide valuable lessons on effective urban defense. The key lies in preparation, strategic planning, and the ability to swiftly adapt tactics as situations evolve.
Narrow urban pathways, such as alleys, can serve as choke points, disrupting the advance of an enemy force and potentially providing an opportunity to employ massing effect strategies.
When devising a defense strategy for a city, there are several key tactics derived from military guides and historical precedents:
* Disruption: This strategy involves fracturing the unity of the enemy’s forces, hindering their ability to effectively execute their plans. In urban settings, disruption can be achieved by manipulating the terrain to divide enemy units, impair their communications, and disrupt their logistics, effectively slowing their momentum and making them more susceptible to counteractions.
* Massing Effects: This principle refers to the concentration of combat power at the right place and time to achieve maximum impact. In urban defense, massing effects might involve concentrating firepower in an area likely to be breached by the enemy or organizing forces discreetly for a surprise counterattack against an advancing adversary.
* Flexibility: A crucial element of any successful defense, flexibility refers to the ability to rapidly adapt to changing circumstances. This includes altering tactics in response to enemy movements, repositioning forces to exploit newly identified weaknesses in the enemy’s approach, and adapting defensive measures to accommodate the evolving urban landscape.
Urban centers are filled with potential resources to create obstructions to enemy movements.
Examining how soldiers defended “Pavlov’s House” in Stalingrad or utilized ruined buildings in Ortona provides valuable insights for modern urban defense.
As the nature of warfare evolves, so must our methods of defending cities. Combining time-tested strategies with modern technology will prepare us for future conflicts. Cities offer a multitude of ways to protect and defend, and leveraging lessons from the past will aid in devising intelligent plans for future conflicts.
This knowledge is not only vital for military commanders, but the skills and tactics involved in urban defense are also invaluable to civilians attempting to survive amidst conflict. This was explored in Selco Begovic’s interview recorded in the SHTF Anthology, which underscores the importance of understanding and mastering urban defense.
Defending a city requires as much intellectual prowess as physical strength. Urban defense is a blend of art and science, demanding a comprehensive understanding of both the physical and historical landscapes of urban combat. Looking forward, the lessons gleaned from past urban battles, combined with a solid grounding in military doctrine, will equip today’s defenders with the strategies necessary to secure victory.
Our Thoughts
The urban landscape’s complexity indeed presents a unique battlefield, as the article rightly suggests. The notion of urban defense is not just a military strategy; it’s a survival skill that could prove vital for civilians caught in the throes of conflict.
The key elements of disruption, massing effects, and flexibility are fundamentally sound strategies. Disruption, in particular, resonates with our survivalist ethos, as it mirrors the idea of using the environment to your advantage.
However, the article’s emphasis on the importance of historical precedents is crucial. The Battle of Stalingrad, the struggle for Mosul, and the defense of “Pavlov’s House” offer invaluable lessons that can be applied in modern urban defense strategies.
The idea of blending time-tested strategies with modern technology is intriguing. As we often advocate, the best survival strategies combine traditional wisdom with modern advancements.
Finally, the assertion that defending a city requires intellectual prowess as much as physical strength aligns perfectly with our belief that survival is as much a mental game as it is a physical one.
In conclusion, the article offers a compelling exploration of urban defense that resonates with our survivalist mindset. It reiterates the importance of being prepared, adaptable, and resourceful—principles that are the very essence of survivalism.
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
-
Tactical1 year ago
70-Year-Old Fends Off Intruder with Lead-Powered Message
-
Tactical1 year ago
Vape Shop Employee Confronts Armed Crooks, Sends Them Running
-
Preparedness1 year ago
Ex-Ballerina’s Guilty Verdict Sends Tremors Through Gun-Owner Community
-
Preparedness1 year ago
Good Samaritan Saves Trooper in Harrowing Interstate Confrontation
-
Tactical1 year ago
Midnight SUV Theft Interrupted by Armed Homeowner’s Retaliation
-
Survival Stories2 years ago
Emily’s 30-Day Experience of Being Stranded on a Desert Island
-
Preparedness1 year ago
Arizona Engineer’s Headless Body Found in Desert: Friend Charged
-
Preparedness1 year ago
Boy Saves Dad from Bear Attack with One Perfect Shot