Connect with us

Preparedness

San Diego Judge Finalizes Sentencing of Antifa Members after Violent Clash

Published

on

A wave of legal repercussions has crashed down on eight members of Antifa in Southern California after a high-profile violent clash in the early days of 2021. These sentences are seen by many as the first successful closure of an Antifa-related conspiracy case. The series of incidents that led to these court proceedings happened on January 9, 2021, less than two weeks before the inauguration of President Joe Biden.

On this day, a rally was planned by a group of Trump supporters at Pacific Beach, California and was counter-protested by dozens of Antifa members. What started as a peaceful assembly quickly spiraled out of control.

“Antifa could have assembled and protested and stood across the street and called them white supremacists, but you cannot use force to suppress others’ freedom of speech.”

Reportedly, the Antifa members, prepared for violence, assaulted Trump supporters and bystanders with bear mace, pepper spray, and other chemicals. According to Andy Ngo, a Post Millennial senior editor and dedicated Antifa reporter, these Antifa associates also engaged in physical violence, including punching, kicking, and hitting people with skateboards.

In the aftermath, a total of 12 Antifa associates were indicted, with most choosing to plead guilty. Nevertheless, two individuals, Brian Lightfoot and Jeremy White, opted to defend their case before the jury. Ultimately, they were convicted.

In a recent ruling by San Diego Superior Court Judge Daniel Goldstein, eight defendants, including White and Lightfoot, were sentenced. This follows four prior sentencing decisions related to the same event.

The list of convicted Antifa affiliates from the Pacific Beach riot includes:

Alexander Akridge-Jacobs (33) – Pled guilty to felony conspiracy to riot and felony assault, sentenced to nine months in county jail. He is expected to be released in November.

Jonah Bigel – Pled guilty in 2021 to assault with a deadly weapon, received a suspended prison sentence. Did not appear in court.

Jesse Cannon (34) – Pled guilty to felony conspiracy to riot, two counts of felony assault, and felony assault in an unrelated case. Sentenced to five years in prison, eligible for parole in December.

Joseph Gaskins (23) – Pled guilty to felony assault and assault with a deadly weapon in a 2020 BLM riot. Sentenced to one year in county jail with an additional two years of probation. Expected release is in December.

Brian Lightfoot (27) – Convicted of felony conspiracy to riot and five counts of unlawful use of tear gas. Sentenced to two years in a “fire camp” prison to learn firefighting skills.

Christian Martinez (25) – Pled guilty to felony conspiracy to riot and felony assault. Sentenced to six months in county jail and probation. Expected release is in September.

Luis Mora (32) – Pled guilty to felony conspiracy to riot and felony assault. Sentenced to two years and eight months in state prison. Eligible for parole in August 2025.

Samuel “Ruchelle” Ogden (26) – Pled guilty to felony conspiracy to riot and felony assault. Sentenced to one year in county jail and two years probation.

Bryan Rivera (22) – Pled guilty to felony conspiracy to riot and felony assault. Sentenced to 180 days in county jail.

Faraz Talab (29) – Pled guilty to felony conspiracy to riot and felony assault. Sentenced to one year in jail and two years’ probation. Scheduled for release in December.

Jeremy White (41) – Convicted of felony conspiracy to riot. Sentenced to two years in state prison.

Erich “Nikki” Yach (40) – Pled guilty to felony conspiracy to riot, felony assault, and felony unlawful use of tear gas. Sentenced to four years and eight months in prison. Eligible for parole in October.

This landmark case, culminating in the sentencing of these twelve Antifa associates, sends a potent message on the legal consequences of violence and disorder.


Do you agree with the judge's decision to have Antifa associates serve time in jail stemming from violence as part of maintaining public safety and respecting legal rights?

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

6 Comments

6 Comments

  1. Virginia Herbert

    July 17, 2024 at 11:30 am

    Their senteces were too light. People attending Jan 6 ptotest who never touched another person were sentenced for severa years. These terrorists got off very light. Hopefully the victims will bring civil suits

  2. Jennifer V

    July 17, 2024 at 1:09 pm

    For too long, protesters that use violence and destruction to silence another group have been getting away with either too light of a sentence/charges, or nothing at all as a consequence. This practice has led to a free for all mentality that sends the message that it’s ok to be destructive and violent to whomever they disagree with. Many people now fear to say out loud what they feel or which way they stand on any given subject to even whom they support in an election. We used to be able to proudly say I stand with xyz or I disagree with the way things are being done without being in fear of our lives, family or property being violated. Groups like these have caused true terror in our society and it needs to be called out and punished to the full extent of the law! Soft on crime and violence policies are destroying our world and sending a message that it’s ok to do what you want, you will never have to answer for it. This is not a partisan issue either. Anyone that breaks the law and uses violence and destruction to silence another person or group should be punished accordingly.

  3. Timothy

    July 17, 2024 at 2:29 pm

    judge needs to buy security for the future. Many kooks in Kookyfornia

  4. Helen

    July 18, 2024 at 12:13 am

    Wish the sentences were longer than what is stated in the article. I’m sure they will continue the assaults after they are released. These people are really sick!!

  5. Old Man

    July 20, 2024 at 11:43 am

    Round them all up, put them on a boat, and ship them back to Africa.

  6. John Harrison

    July 20, 2024 at 4:51 pm

    That’s all? when J6ers are still in jail waiting trial or release.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Preparedness

Unlock the Secrets of Rainwater Harvesting for Self-Reliance

Published

on

Collecting rainwater is a practical method of harnessing natural resources, involving the capture of runoff from roofs or other impermeable surfaces for future use. This straightforward process typically involves directing rain from rooftops into gutters, which then channel the water through downspouts into storage containers.

Rainwater harvesting systems can vary in complexity. They range from simple rain barrels to more intricate setups with large cisterns capable of meeting the water demands of an entire household. While often associated with rural settings or developing countries, rainwater harvesting is increasingly recognized as a feasible option for homes and businesses alike.

Before embarking on a rainwater harvesting project, it is crucial to familiarize yourself with local regulations. “Colorado basically bans it, and other states may have restrictions as well.” Therefore, understanding the legal landscape is an essential first step.

The potential volume of rainwater you can collect depends on specific calculations. The basic formula is 1 inch of rain falling on 1 square foot of roof yields 0.623 gallons. A more straightforward calculation is that 1 inch of rain on a 1,000 square foot roof produces 623 gallons. To estimate annual collection potential, you need to know your area’s average annual rainfall and the square footage of your roof. Suitable roofing materials for catchment systems include aluminum, tiles, slate, or galvanized corrugated iron. Collection systems can be installed on various structures such as homes, barns, or other outbuildings.

The size and complexity of your system can vary, but they all share core principles. The simplest method involves placing a barrel under a gutter downspout. These barrels are often readily available and fit easily into most settings. However, they generally hold only 50 to 100 gallons, which means they can overflow quickly.

For those needing more storage, larger tanks can be used. This method involves a “dry” collection pipe that empties into a tank after each rain. These systems are beneficial in areas with infrequent but heavy rainfalls. Although they are less complex, the tanks are large and must be placed near the house.

A more sophisticated option involves underground piping to connect multiple downspouts. This setup allows for collecting rainwater from the entire roof surface and locating the storage tank away from the house. However, it is more costly due to the need for underground pipes and requires careful planning to ensure proper elevation differences.

Rainwater stored in these systems typically has a bacterial load similar to natural streams, so it must be treated for safe consumption. If rainwater is your primary water source, a pressurized system will be necessary to deliver water throughout your home. For those using rainwater for irrigation or as a backup, systems like the Alexapure Pro can provide sufficient potable water for drinking and cooking.

Having a water catchment system, even a simple one, can offer peace of mind during power outages, especially for those relying on well water. Knowing you have a backup water source can be invaluable in emergencies, ensuring you’re prepared for whatever comes your way.


Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

Preparedness

Master Crisis Survival with the Rule of Three

Published

on

In an unpredictable world, being prepared for emergencies is more than just a smart idea; it’s essential. Whether it’s a car accident in a remote location or getting stranded in the wilderness, knowing survival skills can make all the difference. However, it’s not enough to just learn these skills or own the right tools; you must also know how to prioritize them in a crisis.

Survival experts often refer to the Rule of Three when making decisions under pressure. This rule provides a guideline for how long you can survive without essential needs like air, shelter, water, and food. While there are variables, such as climate and individual size, the Rule of Three is a useful framework for prioritizing needs.

The most immediate concern in any emergency is oxygen. “Just a few seconds of oxygen deprivation to the brain can cause someone to lose consciousness,” and prolonged deprivation can lead to death. Therefore, if someone in your group is injured and struggling to breathe, your first task is to address this issue. Basic first aid skills, including CPR and the Heimlich Maneuver, can be life-saving.

Once immediate medical needs are addressed, the next priority is shelter. Shelter isn’t just about having a roof over your head; it also includes clothing. Being improperly dressed for the weather can lead to dangerous situations, such as hypothermia. It’s crucial to know how to create a shelter and build a fire for warmth. Fire not only provides heat but also allows for cooking and water purification.

Water is another critical need. Most experts agree that you can’t survive more than three days without it. However, environmental conditions can affect this timeline. In hot climates, for example, you’ll need more water. It’s essential to know how to find and purify water in the wilderness to prevent illnesses like diarrhea, which can hasten dehydration.

While you can survive longer without food than water, it’s still important. Having emergency food supplies can be a lifesaver, but in their absence, you’ll need to forage, hunt, or fish for sustenance. Rationing what you have is crucial to making it last as long as possible.

Beyond physical needs, hope is a critical component of survival. Without it, the will to continue fades. The movie *Castaway* illustrates this well. Tom Hanks’ character says, “I know what I have to do now. I’ve got to keep breathing because tomorrow the sun will rise. Who knows what the tide could bring.” This mindset is vital for enduring tough situations.

Finally, human companionship is another often overlooked necessity. In the film, the character creates a companion out of a volleyball named Wilson to combat loneliness. Having people you can depend on and who will notice if you go missing is crucial for any survival plan.

In summary, preparedness is about more than just having the right tools or skills; it’s about knowing how to prioritize your actions in a crisis. By following the Rule of Three, you can make informed decisions that increase your chances of survival.


Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

Preparedness

Uncover Hidden Laws Shaping Your Homesteading Dream

Published

on

For those seeking a lifestyle rooted in self-sufficiency, homesteading offers a compelling path. However, the dream of living off the land is often shaped by the legal landscape of homesteading laws and restrictions that vary widely depending on where you reside.

The concept of homesteading is not new. According to The History Channel, “The 1862 Homestead Act accelerated settlement of U.S. western territory by allowing any American, including freed slaves, to put in a claim for up to 160 free acres of federal land.” Although the Homestead Act was repealed in 1976, the spirit of homesteading persists, with new laws designed to protect the rights of modern homesteaders.

Today, homesteading encompasses a range of practices focused on self-sufficiency, from growing one’s own food to adopting sustainable living practices. Whether in rural expanses or urban rooftops, the homesteading lifestyle is adaptable, but it largely hinges on the “laws of the land.”

One of the key legal instruments for homesteaders is the Declaration of Homestead. As Mother Earth News notes, “A Declaration of Homestead is a simple legal document which can help to protect your house and property in times of economic hardship.” This document can safeguard your home from creditors, though the extent of protection varies by state.

States have different approaches to homestead protection laws, which allow property owners to designate a portion of their property as a “homestead,” making it off-limits to creditors. These protections often differ in terms of acreage or property value, with rural properties generally receiving greater exemptions due to their agricultural use.

For those dreaming of a homestead lifestyle, understanding state-specific laws is crucial. For instance, Indiana allows individuals to claim up to $10,000 worth of property as a homestead without a maximum size limit, offering significant protection from creditors.

Beyond state laws, local regulations can significantly impact homesteading plans. Deed restrictions, zoning regulations, and building codes all play a role in what is permissible on your property. For example, deed restrictions might prevent you from erecting certain structures, while zoning laws could limit your ability to sell homemade goods.

Building codes can also pose challenges, especially for those interested in alternative construction methods. As GOKCE Capital explains, “Even if a parcel of land has no HOA or zoning restrictions, the local municipality or county may still require you to build according to their local building code.”

Livestock ownership is another area where homesteaders must navigate complex regulations. What animals you can raise, and how many, often depend on your specific location. Even within states, counties and cities may have differing ordinances regarding livestock.

For those looking to sell their homestead products, understanding cottage food laws is essential. These laws, which vary by state, govern the sale of homemade food items, often restricting certain goods to protect consumer safety.

Wildlife laws can also affect homesteaders, as many areas have regulations to protect local fauna. Additionally, some places have surprising restrictions, such as prohibitions against front-yard edible gardens.

Beekeeping, a popular homesteading activity, is subject to its own set of regulations. Local laws may limit the number of hives you can maintain, particularly in urban areas.

Finally, rainwater harvesting is a practice embraced by many homesteaders, but its legality varies. While Texas encourages it with tax incentives, Colorado prohibits it, highlighting the importance of researching local laws before collecting rainwater.

In conclusion, while homesteading offers a path to self-sufficiency, it is essential to thoroughly research and understand the various laws and restrictions that may impact your homesteading journey.


Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

Trending

" "