Preparedness
Ohio Homeowner’s Decisive Action Ends Intruder Threat
In the quiet hours of an early Friday morning, a tense encounter unfolded in Englewood, Ohio, resulting in the death of an alleged intruder. The incident occurred around 2 a.m., when 43-year-old Matthew Culham was reportedly shot and killed after a confrontation with a homeowner.
The series of events began when the residents of the home, a couple, were alerted by strange noises emanating from their backyard. Concerned, they promptly dialed 911 to report the suspicious activity. During the call, the girlfriend informed the dispatcher that her boyfriend was retrieving a firearm to investigate the situation.
As the call progressed, the unsettling sound of three gunshots was captured by the dispatcher.
When police arrived on the scene, they discovered Culham’s body lying in the yard. Englewood Police Chief Corey Follick provided insight into the incident, suggesting that the homeowner was likely attempting to assess any potential damage or theft when Culham allegedly charged at him.
Follick noted, “Most burglars, if they determine that a home is occupied, once they’re detected, they normally flee the area…[but] this subject stayed on their property and confronted the homeowner when he was out double-checking to see what all may have been damaged or stolen from his property or who the person was on his property.”
This incident highlights the unpredictable nature of home intrusions and the critical importance of being prepared for such encounters. It serves as a stark reminder that not all intruders will flee when detected, and homeowners must be ready to protect themselves if necessary.
Watch a local news report about the incident below:
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
Thomas Moyer
January 10, 2025 at 12:49 pm
The “Justice” system cannot protect the average citizen. In fact, the normal response is not sufficient to prevent the crime. Courts have ruled that the “Government” has no responsibility to protect a “specific” citizen, but the community in general. Thus, it is the responsibility of a specific citizen to protect themselves, their families and their property.
Don
January 10, 2025 at 1:13 pm
I guess the bad guys don’t watch the news. More and more of them are getting shot.
Carol
January 10, 2025 at 2:48 pm
From the news accounts, the armed homeowner perhaps was trigger-happy. He shot and killed his neighbor and will have to live with that the rest of his life.
LMB
January 10, 2025 at 4:00 pm
ANYONE THAT INTRUDES ON/IN YOUR PROPERTY, YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO CHARGE THEM WITH CRIMINAL TRESPASSING!!! IF THEY REFUSE TO LEAVE, THEN YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO ESCORT THEM OUT/OFF YOUR PROPERTY BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY!!
CPO Bill
January 11, 2025 at 3:34 pm
Dumb ass asked for it!
Joan
January 11, 2025 at 7:36 pm
He won’t be breaking into any more homes.
Jan
January 12, 2025 at 4:10 am
Play stupid games, get stupid prizes.
Joe Sr B Black
January 12, 2025 at 5:00 pm
I think that an armed homeowner should give the perpetrator a chance to flee, but not at the expense of their safety. But, if once recognized or confronted and they don’t run, then shoot. If they don’t run, it’s pretty clear that they intend to do you harm and you have no obligation to try to determine the extent of that intended harm. Just don’t shoot them in the back, st least not with the first shot!