the SCOTUS, namely Amy Coney Barrett said, that "we" need to prove we were harmed, IF the gov't. and big tech CONSPIRED to sensor or cancel our 1st amendment rights. So IF it is good for the 1st, IT must also apply to the 2nd. BRANDISHING a firearm is no longer illegal, UNLESS the one who is stealing or threatening is harmed. IF the criminal activity escalates, or continues, then the putting down, of the animal or savage is justified. I doubt anyone can be harmed, by a property owner "displaying" or "brandishing" a gun. But there is a low IQ sheeople that have been brainwashed by an evil gov't. in Amerika. Sadly We the People are FORCED, as slaves to pay for this. RED states need to separate from this evil empire.... NOW !